Wang X, Li Y, Li J, Qiu M H, Qi Z Z, Li X Y, Li Y Z, Na K, Han Y L
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 24;49(2):143-149. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200528-00442.
To explore the medication compliance for secondary prevention drugs and long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between hospitals in different regions of China. The Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (OPT-CAD) study was a prospective, multi-center and registered study. Patients diagnosed as ACS and underwent PCI in OPT-CAD study were selected. Taking the Yangtze River as the dividing line between the south and the north of China, these patients were divided into two groups according to the hospitals where the patients visited, namely the southerns region group (=1 958) and the northerns region group (=5 091). In order to reduce selection bias and potential confounding factors, the patients in the two groups were matched by the tendency score, and the patients in the two groups were matched by the 1: 1 nearest match method according to the tendency score. The main endpoint of this study was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurring within 5 years after discharge, namely the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and/or ischemic stroke. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding events defined by the Academic Research Consortium on Hemorrhage (BARC) within 5 years. The secondary preventive drugs was recorded, including antiplatelet drugs, statins, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensinⅡreceptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), etc. Before and after the matching, the secondary preventive medication and the incidence of clinical events of the two groups were compared. A total of 7 049 ACS patients, including 1 958 patients in the southern region group and 5 091 patients in the northern region group were enrolled in this study. There were 5 319 males (37.9%), and the aged was (60.7±6.7) years. After propensity score matching, there were 1 324 cases in each group. Before matching, in the northern region group, the proportion of smoking, hypertension and diabetes, previous history (myocardial infarction, PCI and stroke) and family history of coronary heart disease were higher (all <0.05). The proportion of complex lesions, diffuse lesions, small vessel lesions and thrombotic lesions in the northern region group was higher than that in the southern region group (all <0.05). Sixty months after discharge, the antiplatelet patterns were quite different between patients in the northern and southern region group (<0.001). The proportion of clopidogrel monotherapy in the southern region group was higher than that in the northern region group (9.8% (130/1324) vs. 1.1% (14/1324)), while the proportion of aspirin monotherapy in the northern region group was higher than that in the southern region group (67.4% (893/1324) vs. 46.5% (616/1324)). As for the use of other secondary prophylactic drugs, the proportion of patients in southern region group receiving beta blockers (24.5% (325/1324) vs. 16.8% (222/1324), <0.001) and ACEI/ARB (19.4% (257/1324) vs. 10.0% (133/1324), <0.001) was higher than that in northern region group. After matching, the incidence of MACCE (8.4%(111/1 324) vs.6.2% (82/1 324), =0.030) and BARC 2, 3 and 5 bleeding (6.0% (80/1 324) vs. 4.0% (53/1 324), =0.020) was higher in patients in northern region group. ACS patients who undergo PCI in northern area hospital is at higher prevalence of comorbidities and complicated coronary artery lesions compared to patients in the southern area hospital, and the drug compliance is worse than that in southern area, and the prognosis is also relatively poor.
为探讨中国不同地区医院接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者二级预防药物的用药依从性及长期预后。中国冠心病患者优化抗血小板治疗(OPT-CAD)研究是一项前瞻性、多中心的注册研究。选取OPT-CAD研究中诊断为ACS并接受PCI的患者。以长江作为中国南北分界线,根据患者就诊医院将这些患者分为两组,即南方地区组(=1958例)和北方地区组(=5091例)。为减少选择偏倚和潜在混杂因素,两组患者采用倾向得分匹配,根据倾向得分按1:1最近邻匹配法对两组患者进行匹配。本研究的主要终点是出院后5年内发生的主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE),即心源性死亡、心肌梗死和/或缺血性卒中的复合终点。次要终点是5年内全因死亡、心源性死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性卒中以及出血学术研究联盟(BARC)定义的2、3和5型出血事件。记录二级预防药物,包括抗血小板药物、他汀类药物、β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ACEI/ARB)等。匹配前后比较两组的二级预防用药情况及临床事件发生率。本研究共纳入7049例ACS患者,其中南方地区组1958例,北方地区组5091例。男性5319例(37.9%),年龄为(60.7±6.7)岁。倾向得分匹配后,每组各有1324例。匹配前,北方地区组吸烟、高血压和糖尿病、既往史(心肌梗死、PCI和卒中)以及冠心病家族史的比例较高(均P<0.05)。北方地区组复杂病变、弥漫性病变、小血管病变和血栓性病变的比例高于南方地区组(均P<0.05)。出院60个月后,北方和南方地区组患者的抗血小板模式差异显著(P<0.001)。南方地区组氯吡格雷单药治疗的比例高于北方地区组(9.8%(130/1324)对1.1%(14/1324)),而北方地区组阿司匹林单药治疗的比例高于南方地区组(67.4%(893/1324)对46.5%(616/1324))。至于其他二级预防药物的使用,南方地区组接受β受体阻滞剂(24.5%(325/1324)对16.8%(222/1324),P<0.001)和ACEI/ARB(19.4%(257/1324)对10.0%(133/1324),P<0.001)治疗的患者比例高于北方地区组。匹配后,北方地区组患者的MACCE发生率(8.4%(111/1324)对6.2%(82/1324),P=0.030)和BARC 2、3和5型出血发生率(6.0%(80/1324)对4.0%(53/1324),P=0.020)更高。与南方地区医院的患者相比,北方地区医院接受PCI的ACS患者合并症及复杂冠状动脉病变的患病率更高,用药依从性比南方地区差,预后也相对较差。