Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Jul;62(7):1674-1681. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1885668. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
Lenalidomide maintenance after frontline chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been standard due to the availability of novel therapies, though these remain out of reach for most in low-middle income countries. This single-center, open-label study randomized CLL patients (non-deletion 17p) after frontline therapy to lenalidomide maintenance (dose-escalated 2.5-10mg, 20/28 days per cycle for six months) or observation (2:1 allocation). Forty patients were included over 2018-2020. At a median follow-up of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) with lenalidomide was not significantly different than observation (26 vs. 18 months, = 0.4). Patients with minimal residual disease >10 had a trend toward better PFS with lenalidomide (19 vs. 7 months, = 0.07). Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 16.7% of patients on lenalidomide. Quality of life was comparable between the two arms. Low dose, fixed duration lenalidomide maintenance is not an effective strategy after frontline CIT in CLL.
来那度胺维持治疗在一线化疗免疫治疗(CIT)后在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)中尚未标准化,因为新型疗法的出现,尽管这些疗法在中低收入国家对大多数人来说仍然遥不可及。这项单中心、开放标签研究在一线治疗后将 CLL 患者(非 17p 缺失)随机分配至来那度胺维持治疗组(剂量递增 2.5-10mg,每 28 天 20/28 天,共 6 个月)或观察组(2:1 分配)。2018 年至 2020 年期间共纳入 40 例患者。在中位随访 22 个月时,来那度胺组与观察组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)无显著差异(26 个月 vs. 18 个月, = 0.4)。微小残留病灶 >10 的患者接受来那度胺治疗的 PFS 有改善趋势(19 个月 vs. 7 个月, = 0.07)。来那度胺组有 16.7%的患者出现 3 级中性粒细胞减少症。两组之间的生活质量相当。低剂量、固定疗程的来那度胺维持治疗在 CLL 患者一线 CIT 后并不是一种有效的策略。