Suppr超能文献

在新冠疫情期间,是什么驱使我们对自身健康负责(或不负责任)?人格、思维方式和阴谋心态的作用。

What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality.

作者信息

Lazarević Ljiljana B, Purić Danka, Teovanović Predrag, Lukić Petar, Zupan Zorana, Knežević Goran

机构信息

Institute of Psychology and Laboratory for the Research of Individual Differences, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina str. 18-20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Department of Psychology and Laboratory for the Research of Individual Differences, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina str. 18-20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110771. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.

摘要

该研究旨在调查在新冠疫情期间,人格、思维方式和阴谋心态在与健康相关行为中的作用,即根据新冠指南推荐的健康行为以及参与与新冠相关的伪科学行为。基本人格空间由HEXACO模型定义,并辅以“解体”维度,“解体”代表类似精神病的体验和行为,被重新概念化为一种人格特质。对通过社交媒体和滚雪球方式从普通人群中招募的便利样本(N = 417)进行的中介分析表明,“解体”程度高可预测伪科学行为的参与情况。然而,这种关系完全由高经验性和低理性思维方式介导。新冠指南推荐的健康行为的依从性由高诚实特质预测,而低“解体”程度通过阴谋心态产生直接和间接影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a392/7879160/b78bbd66319d/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

4
Relating Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles With Trait Emotional Intelligence in Broader Personality Space.
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):140-158. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Conspiracy mentality and health-related behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multiwave survey in Italy.
Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):486-496. doi: 10.1002/acp.3770. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
Attentive immobility: Investigating the emotional-cognitive mechanism underlying conspiracy mentality and Covid-19 preventive behaviors.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294681. eCollection 2023.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Psychological Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic Through ESM Data: The EMOTIONS Project.
J Open Psychol Data. 2023 Apr 10;11:6. doi: 10.5334/jopd.83. eCollection 2023.
3
Lifetime prevalence of questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: A preregistered nationally representative survey.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 6;19(11):e0313173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313173. eCollection 2024.
4
Psychological Antecedents and Opportunities for Correcting Negative Attitudes towards COVID-19 Prevention Measures.
IFAC Pap OnLine. 2021;54(13):161-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.438. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
5
Use of immunology in news and YouTube videos in the context of COVID-19: politicisation and information bubbles.
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1327704. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1327704. eCollection 2024.
7
The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294705. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Pseudoscience and COVID-19 - we've had enough already.
Nature. 2020 Apr 27. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01266-z.
2
Personality differences and COVID-19: are extroversion and conscientiousness personality traits associated with engagement with containment measures?
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Jun;42(2):179-184. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2020-0029. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
3
Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation.
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 18;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3.
4
- the relevance of emotions and intuition for parental vaccine conspiracy beliefs and vaccination uptake.
Psychol Health. 2020 May;35(5):538-554. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1673894. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Relating Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles With Trait Emotional Intelligence in Broader Personality Space.
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):140-158. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
How (Ir)rational Is it to Believe in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories?
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):94-107. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1690. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
A systematic review of the traits and cognitions associated with use of and belief in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Aug;23(7):854-869. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1442010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
8
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100.
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):543-556. doi: 10.1177/1073191116659134. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Dec;13(3):106-31. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验