• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追踪日常可疑健康行为及其心理根源的变化:一项预先注册的经验抽样研究。

Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study.

机构信息

Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Philosophy, Laboratory for Research of Individual Differences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 28;13(1):14058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
PMID:37640927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10462719/
Abstract

People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots.

摘要

人们会采用各种有问题的健康做法来保持或恢复健康——他们故意不遵守医疗建议(例如,自行用药或修改规定的治疗方法;iNAR),或者使用传统/补充/替代(TCAM)医学。由于回顾性报告高估了依从性,并受到回忆和期望偏差的影响,我们跟踪了日常有问题的健康行为的变化,并将其与回顾性报告的终生使用情况进行了比较。我们还预先注册并探讨了它们与广泛的心理预测因素的关系——远距离(人格特质和基本思维倾向)和近距离(不同的无根据的信念和偏见,统称为非理性思维模式)。一个社区样本(N=224)在 14 天内跟踪了 iNAR 和 TCAM 使用的日常参与情况,共获得了 3136 个数据点。我们观察到在 14 天内有很高的有问题的健康行为发生率;每日参与率与终生参与率大致相符。iNAR 和 TCAM 之间虽然较弱,但却存在稳健的正相关关系。无论评估方法如何,非理性思维模式都是 TCAM 使用的最重要预测因素。然而,对于 iNAR,只有在回顾性评估时,心理预测因素才会变得相关。我们的研究从个体内和个体间的角度提供了对有问题的健康行为的深入了解,并强调了它们的心理根源的重要性。

相似文献

1
Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study.追踪日常可疑健康行为及其心理根源的变化:一项预先注册的经验抽样研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 28;13(1):14058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w.
2
Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey.塞尔维亚可疑健康行为的流行情况及其心理根源:一项全国代表性调查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e075274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274.
3
Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia.开发一种新的工具来评估故意不遵守官方医疗建议的情况(iNAR-12):塞尔维亚的一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;13(6):e069978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978.
4
Prevalence of Use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the General Population: A Systematic Review of National Studies Published from 2010 to 2019.一般人群中传统医学、补充医学和替代医学的使用情况:2010 年至 2019 年发表的国家研究的系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2022 Jul;45(7):713-735. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01189-w. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Exploring the Mechanisms that Allow Incompatible Beliefs to Coexist in the Cognitive System.探索认知系统中允许不相容信念共存的机制。
Psychol Rep. 2024 Sep 10:332941241280870. doi: 10.1177/00332941241280870.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
A Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Tool (devilSPARC) for Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviors in College Students: A Validation Study.一种用于大学生营养与身体活动行为的移动生态瞬时评估工具(devilSPARC):一项验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 27;18(7):e209. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5969.
9
Not just emotion regulation, but cognition: An experience sampling study testing the relations of ecological interpretation biases and use of emotion regulation strategies with momentary affective states during daily life functioning.不仅是情绪调节,还有认知:一项经验抽样研究,检验生态解释偏差和情绪调节策略的使用与日常生活功能中瞬间情感状态的关系。
Behav Res Ther. 2024 Jun;177:104550. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104550. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
A comparison of retrospectively reported and ecological momentary assessment-reported perceived social support in predicting ecological momentary assessment-reported non-suicidal self-injury.回顾性报告和生态瞬时评估报告的感知社会支持在预测生态瞬时评估报告的非自杀性自我伤害中的比较。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024 Apr;54(2):184-194. doi: 10.1111/sltb.13031. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifetime prevalence of questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: A preregistered nationally representative survey.终身不良健康行为的流行率及其心理根源:一项预先注册的全国代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 6;19(11):e0313173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313173. eCollection 2024.
2
Prevalence of questionable health behaviours in Serbia and their psychological roots: protocol for a nationally representative survey.塞尔维亚可疑健康行为的流行情况及其心理根源:一项全国代表性调查的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e075274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075274.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.生物武器还是骗局?关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发和大流行行为的不同阴谋论之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
2
Development of a novel instrument for assessing intentional non-adherence to official medical recommendations (iNAR-12): a sequential mixed-methods study in Serbia.开发一种新的工具来评估故意不遵守官方医疗建议的情况(iNAR-12):塞尔维亚的一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;13(6):e069978. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069978.
3
I trust my immunity more than your vaccines: "Appeal to nature" bias strongly predicts questionable health behaviors in the COVID-19 pandemic.我更相信我的免疫力,而不是你的疫苗:“诉诸自然”偏见强烈预测了 COVID-19 大流行期间有问题的健康行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0279122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279122. eCollection 2023.
4
Prevalence of Use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the General Population: A Systematic Review of National Studies Published from 2010 to 2019.一般人群中传统医学、补充医学和替代医学的使用情况:2010 年至 2019 年发表的国家研究的系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2022 Jul;45(7):713-735. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01189-w. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
5
Operational definition of complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine derived from a systematic search.从系统搜索中得出的补充、替代和整合医学的操作性定义。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03556-7.
6
Proneness to psychotic-like experiences as a basic personality trait complementing the HEXACO model-A preregistered cross-national study.作为一种基本人格特质的精神病样体验倾向,补充 HEXACO 模型:一项预先注册的跨国研究。
Personal Ment Health. 2022 Aug;16(3):244-262. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1537. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
7
Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Meta-Analysis on Designs, Samples, and Compliance Across Research Fields.生态瞬间评估:跨研究领域的设计、样本和依从性的荟萃分析。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):825-846. doi: 10.1177/10731911211067538. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
8
What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality.在新冠疫情期间,是什么驱使我们对自身健康负责(或不负责任)?人格、思维方式和阴谋心态的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110771. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
9
Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,非理性信念对遵循指南和伪科学行为有着不同的预测作用。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):486-496. doi: 10.1002/acp.3770. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and Support for hydroxychloroquine: A Conceptual Replication-Extension in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context.阴谋论信念、拒绝接种疫苗以及对羟氯喹的支持:COVID-19大流行背景下的概念性重复研究与扩展
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:565128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128. eCollection 2020.