Sakya Surav M, Dinh Mary L, Chan Donald, Pfeifer Cory M
Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Internal Medicine, Riverside Community Hospital, Riverside, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):e12725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12725.
Introduction In 2010 diagnostic radiology (DR) changed the board certification process for residents using the new Core exam. However, there is not a standardized way to evaluate DR residency graduates. With no specific target pass rate for the exam, the "appropriate" pass rate has remained a debated topic among the field. In this paper, the board certification exam passage rates of DR are compared to other medical specialties to assess the standardization method of the American Board of Radiology (ABR) and serve as basis for additional specialties considering changes to their board exam structure. Methods Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) and San Francisco match. Boards passage rates were analyzed using data from the American Board of Medical Specialties. USMLE and board exam passage rates were averaged and ranked, and statistical analysis was conducted using Stata (College Station, TX). Results DR performance on USMLE Step 1 has increased at the lowest rate (0.563 points/year) since 2005 and anesthesiology performance has increased at the greatest rate (1.313 points/year). Residents matching from US allopathic medical schools during the 2010 and 2012 years had DR oral board exams with USMLE 1 averages of 232 and 235, respectively. First-time pass rate for the first Core exam was 87% and the overall pass rate since the first Core exam has been 88.54%. The Spearman rho coefficient for specialty ranks of board passage rate and USMLE 1 was 0.0679 (p = 0.8101). The Spearman rho coefficient for board passage rate and USMLE 2 CK was 0.1430 (p = 0.6257). The Spearman rho coefficient for USMLE 1 and USMLE 2 CK was 0.8317 (p = 0.0002). Conclusions Specialty board pass rates have not increased in concert with improved trainee performance on the USMLE. USMLE performance among those matching in diagnostic radiology has increased, ABR board exam passage rate has decreased. ABR determines passing thresholds to the relative performance of examinees rather than using a criterion referenced Angoff standard.
引言 2010年,诊断放射学(DR)采用新的核心考试改变了住院医师的委员会认证流程。然而,目前尚无标准化的方法来评估DR住院医师培训项目的毕业生。由于该考试没有特定的目标通过率,“合适”的通过率一直是该领域争论的话题。在本文中,将DR的委员会认证考试通过率与其他医学专业进行比较,以评估美国放射学会(ABR)的标准化方法,并为考虑改变其委员会考试结构的其他专业提供依据。方法 从国家住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)和旧金山匹配计划中获取美国医师执照考试(USMLE)的成绩。使用美国医学专业委员会的数据对各委员会的通过率进行分析。对USMLE和委员会考试的通过率进行平均和排名,并使用Stata(德克萨斯州大学站)进行统计分析。结果 自2005年以来,DR在USMLE第一步考试中的成绩增长速度最慢(每年0.563分),而麻醉学的成绩增长速度最快(每年1.313分)。2010年和2012年从美国全科医学学校匹配的住院医师参加DR口试时,USMLE第一步考试的平均成绩分别为232分和235分。第一次核心考试的首次通过率为87%,自第一次核心考试以来的总体通过率为88.54%。委员会通过率与USMLE第一步考试专业排名的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.0679(p = 0.8101)。委员会通过率与USMLE第二步临床知识考试的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.1430(p = 0.6257)。USMLE第一步考试与USMLE第二步临床知识考试的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.8317(p = 0.0002)。结论 专业委员会的通过率并未随着学员在USMLE考试中的成绩提高而同步提高。诊断放射学专业匹配人员的USMLE成绩有所提高,但ABR委员会考试的通过率却有所下降。ABR是根据考生的相对表现来确定及格分数线的,而不是使用基于标准参照的安格夫标准。