Suppr超能文献

美国传染病学会现行指南中推荐意见的推荐强度及证据质量

Strength of Recommendation and Quality of Evidence for Recommendations in Current Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines.

作者信息

Miles Kaitlin E, Rodriguez Ryan, Gross Alan E, Kalil Andre C

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 21;8(2):ofab033. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab033. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) is a systematic approach to grading strength of recommendation (SOR) and quality of evidence (QOE) for guideline recommendations. We aimed to assess the relationship between SOR and QOE in current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis, we analyzed the frequency of SOR-QOE pairings, including discordance (defined as strong SOR based on expert opinion, very low, or low QOE) for GRADEd recommendations in IDSA guidelines published since 2010. Data for each recommendation were extracted on SOR, QOE, the domain of disease management (one or more of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and other categories), and relevance to drug or nondrug treatment.

RESULTS

Seventeen eligible guidelines provided 1042 unique GRADEd recommendations (n = 237, 711, 76, and 73 pertaining to diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and other domains, respectively; n = 574 and 137 pertaining to drug and nondrug treatment). Overall, the most common SOR was strong (71.8%; n = 748) and the most common QOE was low (48.6%; n = 506). Among all strong recommendations, 47.1% (n = 352) demonstrated discordance with QOE. By domain, strong recommendations were discordant in 36.6%, 51.4%, 29.3%, and 58.1% of recommendations pertaining to diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and other domains, respectively. Similarly, 50.7% and 54.0% of strong recommendations related to drug and nondrug treatment were discordant, respectively. We identified 39.6% of discordant recommendations to be consistent with good practice statements, which are recommended to be labeled as such without formal GRADEd designations of SOR or QOE.

CONCLUSIONS

Among all IDSA guideline recommendations with strong SOR, approximately half were discordant with QOE, and this frequency varied across strata of domains of disease management.

摘要

背景

推荐意见评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)是一种对指南推荐意见的推荐强度(SOR)和证据质量(QOE)进行分级的系统方法。我们旨在评估美国传染病学会(IDSA)现行指南中SOR与QOE之间的关系。

方法

在这项横断面分析中,我们分析了SOR-QOE配对的频率,包括2010年以来发布的IDSA指南中经GRADE分级的推荐意见中的不一致情况(定义为基于专家意见的强推荐,极低或低QOE)。提取了每项推荐意见的SOR、QOE、疾病管理领域(诊断、治疗、预防和其他类别中的一项或多项)以及与药物或非药物治疗的相关性数据。

结果

17项符合条件的指南提供了1042条独特的经GRADE分级的推荐意见(分别有237条、711条、76条和73条与诊断、治疗、预防和其他领域相关;574条和137条与药物和非药物治疗相关)。总体而言,最常见的SOR为强推荐(71.8%;n = 748),最常见的QOE为低质量(48.6%;n = 506)。在所有强推荐意见中,47.1%(n = 352)显示与QOE不一致。按领域划分,在与诊断、治疗、预防和其他领域相关的推荐意见中,分别有36.6%、51.4%、29.3%和58.1%的强推荐意见存在不一致。同样,与药物和非药物治疗相关的强推荐意见中,分别有50.7%和54.0%存在不一致。我们发现39.6%的不一致推荐意见与良好实践声明一致,建议将其如此标注,而无需正式的GRADE分级的SOR或QOE指定。

结论

在所有具有强SOR的IDSA指南推荐意见中,约一半与QOE不一致,且这种频率在疾病管理领域的不同层次中有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/7885855/764a459da17b/ofab033_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验