Oshima Megumi, Hara Akinori, Toyama Tadashi, Jun Min, Pollock Carol, Jardine Meg, Harrap Stephen, Poulter Neil, Cooper Mark E, Woodward Mark, Chalmers John, Perkovic Vlado, Wong Muh Geot, Wada Takashi
Department of Renal and Metabolic, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Nov 10;6(2):284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.039. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Several circulating markers, including autoantibodies to erythropoietin receptor (anti-EPOR antibodies), have been identified as useful biomarkers in predicting diabetic kidney disease progression. However, a direct comparison of their utility is lacking. We aimed to validate and to compare the prognostic value of anti-EPOR antibodies with that of other known biomarkers, using the ADVANCE trial and its long-term follow-up, ADVANCE-ON, cohorts.
In this nested case-control study from the ADVANCE trial cohort, we included 165 case participants who had the composite kidney outcome (renal replacement therapy, renal death, or doubling of serum creatinine to ≥200 μmol/l) and 330 matched controls. We compared the associations of baseline plasma levels of anti-EPOR antibodies, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)-1 and -2, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-7 with kidney outcomes.
Cases had higher baseline plasma levels of anti-EPOR antibodies than controls (median 1.7 vs. 0.6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay unit, < 0.001). Higher levels of anti-EPOR antibodies were associated with an increased risk of kidney outcome (odds ratio 2.16 [95% confidence interval 1.51, 3.08], per 1 SD of log-transformed levels) after adjusting for conventional markers. Elevated circulating TNFR1 and TNFR2 levels, and lower BMP-7 levels at baseline, were associated with poor kidney outcome (odds ratios 2.06 [1.29, 3.30], 1.66 [1.13, 2.43], and 0.45 [0.32, 0.65], respectively). The addition of anti-EPOR antibodies into the model improved the prediction of kidney outcome, regardless of other biomarkers.
Anti-EPOR antibodies provide a promising biomarker, as with TNFR1, TNFR2, and BMP-7, in predicting kidney disease progression in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
包括促红细胞生成素受体自身抗体(抗EPOR抗体)在内的几种循环标志物已被确定为预测糖尿病肾病进展的有用生物标志物。然而,缺乏对它们效用的直接比较。我们旨在利用ADVANCE试验及其长期随访ADVANCE-ON队列,验证并比较抗EPOR抗体与其他已知生物标志物的预后价值。
在这项来自ADVANCE试验队列的巢式病例对照研究中,我们纳入了165例发生复合肾脏结局(肾脏替代治疗、肾脏死亡或血清肌酐翻倍至≥200μmol/l)的病例参与者和330例匹配的对照。我们比较了抗EPOR抗体、肿瘤坏死因子受体(TNFR)-1和-2以及骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)-7的基线血浆水平与肾脏结局的关联。
病例组的抗EPOR抗体基线血浆水平高于对照组(中位数1.7对0.6酶联免疫吸附测定单位,<0.001)。在校正传统标志物后,抗EPOR抗体水平升高与肾脏结局风险增加相关(比值比2.16 [95%置信区间1.51, 3.08],每1个标准差的对数转换水平)。基线时循环TNFR1和TNFR2水平升高以及BMP-7水平降低与不良肾脏结局相关(比值比分别为2.06 [1.29, 3.30]、1.66 [1.1, 2.43]和0.45 [0.32, 0.65])。无论其他生物标志物如何,将抗EPOR抗体添加到模型中均可改善肾脏结局的预测。
与TNFR1、TNFR2和BMP-7一样,抗EPOR抗体在预测2型糖尿病患者的肾病进展方面是一种有前景的生物标志物。