Suppr超能文献

采用倾向评分匹配和对数秩检验分析腹腔镜经皮体外闭合术(LPEC)与开放修补术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的手术效果比较。

Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):941-950. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08354-9. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a number of studies comparing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH), the putative advantage of LH remains controversial due to a paucity of firm evidence. We hypothesized that LH has both advantages and disadvantages compared to OH and sought to clarify them by comprehensively analyzing the retrospective data using the combination of multiple statistical methods.

METHODS

Operative data for inguinal hernia during the period from February 1999 to December 2019 were examined. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the surgical procedure: laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC, n = 2410) and OH (n = 2038). Operative and anesthesia times and incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated using the propensity score methods and log-rank test.

RESULTS

In comparison with OH, operative time of LPEC was longer for unilateral repair (21.59 ± 8.1 min vs 18.01 ± 8.0 min; p < 0.001) and shorter for bilateral repairs (28.55 ± 10.1 min vs 33.23 ± 11.7 min; p < 0.001), while anesthesia times were longer for both unilateral repair (57.67 ± 10.1 min vs 40.62 ± 11.9 min; p < 0.001) and bilateral repairs (65.95 ± 12.5 min vs 56.35 ± 15.1 min; p < 0.001). LPEC significantly reduced the risk of metachronous contralateral hernia (MCLH) (0.52% vs 9.29%; p < 0.001), but the recurrence rate was higher (0.21% vs 0.04%; p = 0.002) than OH. Orchiectomy due to testicular atrophy or torsion was required in 3 cases of OH (0.19%), whereas it was not seen in LPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC had a less risk of MCLH and testicular complications but was associated with a higher recurrence rate and longer anesthesia time. Propensity scoring techniques can enhance the robustness of retrospective comparisons between groups over several years of data collection, which is frequently required in pediatric surgery studies.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多研究比较了腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LH)和开放式疝修补术(OH),但由于缺乏确凿的证据,LH 的潜在优势仍存在争议。我们假设 LH 与 OH 相比既有优势也有劣势,并通过综合分析使用多种统计方法的回顾性数据来阐明这些优势和劣势。

方法

检查了 1999 年 2 月至 2019 年 12 月期间腹股沟疝的手术数据。根据手术程序将患者分为两组:腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合术(LPEC,n=2410)和 OH(n=2038)。使用倾向评分法和对数秩检验评估手术和麻醉时间以及术后并发症的发生率。

结果

与 OH 相比,LPEC 单侧修复的手术时间更长(21.59±8.1 min 比 18.01±8.0 min;p<0.001),双侧修复的手术时间更短(28.55±10.1 min 比 33.23±11.7 min;p<0.001),而单侧修复的麻醉时间更长(57.67±10.1 min 比 40.62±11.9 min;p<0.001),双侧修复的麻醉时间更长(65.95±12.5 min 比 56.35±15.1 min;p<0.001)。LPEC 显著降低了对侧迟发性疝(MCLH)的风险(0.52%比 9.29%;p<0.001),但复发率更高(0.21%比 0.04%;p=0.002)。OH 中有 3 例(0.19%)因睾丸萎缩或扭转需要行睾丸切除术,而 LPEC 中未见。

结论

LPEC 发生 MCLH 和睾丸并发症的风险较低,但复发率较高,麻醉时间较长。倾向评分技术可以增强对多年数据收集的组间回顾性比较的稳健性,这在小儿外科研究中经常需要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验