Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):590-598. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1885637. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Preparing future professionals for highly dynamic settings require self-directed learning in authentic learning situations. Authentic learning situations imply teamwork. Therefore, designing education for future professionals requires an understanding of how self-directed learning develops in teams. We followed (bio-)medical sciences students ( = 15) during an 8-month period in which they worked on an innovation project in teams of 4-6 students. Template analysis of 39 transcripts of audio-recorded group meetings revealed three mechanisms along which group dynamics influenced self-directed learning behaviour. First, if expressions of emotions were met with an inquisitive response, this resulted in self-monitoring or feelings of responsibility. Second, openness in the group towards creativity or idea exploration stimulated critical thinking. Third, disputational talk frustrated learning, because it adversely affected group cohesion. We conclude that emotions, openness, and relatedness are important drivers of self-directed learning in teams and hence should be given explicit attention in designing collaborative learning for future professionals.
培养未来专业人才需要在真实的学习环境中进行自主学习。真实的学习环境意味着团队合作。因此,为未来的专业人才设计教育需要了解自主学习在团队中是如何发展的。我们在 8 个月的时间里跟踪了(生物)医学科学专业的学生( = 15 名),他们以 4-6 人的小组形式参与了一个创新项目。对 39 次录音小组会议记录的模板分析揭示了小组动态影响自主学习行为的三个机制。首先,如果表达情绪得到好奇的回应,这会导致自我监控或责任感。其次,小组对创造力或想法探索的开放性会激发批判性思维。第三,争论性的谈话会阻碍学习,因为它会对团队凝聚力产生不利影响。我们的结论是,情感、开放性和相关性是团队自主学习的重要驱动因素,因此在为未来的专业人士设计协作学习时应给予明确关注。