Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Medical Library, Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2189553. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2189553.
The goal of this systematic review was to examine self-directed learning (SDL) assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education.
Seven electronic databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) to retrieve English-language articles published between 2015 and July of 2022, investigating assessment of SDL learning outcomes. Extracted data included the sample size, field of study, study design, SDL activity type, SDL assessment method, number of SDL assessments used, study quality, number of SDL components present utilising the framework the authors developed, and SDL activity outcomes. We also assessed relationships between SDL assessment method and number of SDL components, study quality, field of study, and study outcomes.
Of the 141 studies included, the majority of study participants were medical (51.8%) or nursing (34.8%) students. The most common SDL assessment method used was internally-developed perception surveys (49.6%). When evaluating outcomes for SDL activities, most studies reported a positive or mixed/neutral outcome (58.2% and 34.8%, respectively). There was a statistically significant relationship between both number and type of assessments used, and study quality, with knowledge assessments (median-IQR 11.5) being associated with higher study quality ( < 0.001). Less than half (48.9%) of the studies used more than one assessment method to evaluate the effectiveness of SDL activities. Having more than one assessment (mean 9.49) was associated with higher quality study ( < 0.001).
The results of our systematic review suggest that SDL assessment practices within undergraduate health professions education vary greatly, as different aspects of SDL were leveraged and implemented by diverse groups of learners to meet different learning needs and professional accreditation requirements. Evidence-based best practices for the assessment of SDL across undergraduate healthcare professions education should include the use of multiple assessments, with direct and indirect measures, to more accurately assess student performance.
本系统评价的目的是考察本科健康职业教育中的自我导向学习(SDL)评估实践。
检索了 7 个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、ERIC、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Web of Science),以获取 2015 年至 2022 年 7 月期间发表的评估 SDL 学习成果的英文文章。提取的数据包括样本量、研究领域、研究设计、SDL 活动类型、SDL 评估方法、使用的 SDL 评估次数、研究质量、利用作者开发的框架呈现的 SDL 组件数量以及 SDL 活动结果。我们还评估了 SDL 评估方法与 SDL 组件数量、研究质量、研究领域和研究结果之间的关系。
在纳入的 141 项研究中,大多数研究参与者为医学(51.8%)或护理(34.8%)学生。使用最广泛的 SDL 评估方法是内部开发的感知调查(49.6%)。在评估 SDL 活动的结果时,大多数研究报告了积极或混合/中性的结果(分别为 58.2%和 34.8%)。使用的评估数量和类型与研究质量之间存在统计学显著关系,知识评估(中位数-IQR 为 11.5)与较高的研究质量相关( < 0.001)。只有不到一半(48.9%)的研究使用多种评估方法来评估 SDL 活动的效果。使用多个评估(平均值 9.49)与高质量研究相关( < 0.001)。
本系统评价的结果表明,本科健康职业教育中的 SDL 评估实践差异很大,因为不同的学习群体利用和实施了 SDL 的不同方面,以满足不同的学习需求和专业认证要求。本科医疗保健专业教育中 SDL 评估的循证最佳实践应包括使用多种评估方法,包括直接和间接测量,以更准确地评估学生的表现。