Suppr超能文献

儿童金黄色葡萄球菌烫伤样皮肤综合征住院患者的抗生素方案及相关结局。

Antibiotic Regimens and Associated Outcomes in Children Hospitalized With Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome.

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2021 Mar;16(3):149-155. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3529.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal antibiotic regimen for use in hospitalized children with staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS). Various regimens may confer toxin suppression and/or additional coverage for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA).

OBJECTIVES

To describe antibiotic regimens in hospitalized children with SSSS and examine the association between antistaphylococcal antibiotic regimens and patient outcomes.

DESIGN/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of children hospitalized with SSSS using the Pediatric Health Information System database (2011-2016). Children who received clindamycin monotherapy, clindamycin plus MSSA coverage (eg, nafcillin), or clindamycin plus MRSA coverage (eg, vancomycin) were included. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes were treatment failure and cost. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to compare outcomes among antibiotic groups.

RESULTS

Of 1,259 children included, 828 children received the most common antistaphylococcal antibiotic regimens: clindamycin monotherapy (47%), clindamycin plus MSSA coverage (33%), and clindamycin plus MRSA coverage (20%). Children receiving clindamycin plus MRSA coverage had higher illness severity (44%) compared with clindamycin monotherapy (28%) and clindamycin plus MSSA (32%) (P =.001). In adjusted analyses, LOS and treatment failure did not differ among the 3 regimens (P =.42 and P =.26, respectively). Cost was significantly lower for children receiving clindamycin monotherapy and highest in those receiving clindamycin plus MRSA coverage (mean, $4,839 vs $5,348, respectively; P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with SSSS, the addition of MSSA or MRSA coverage to clindamycin monotherapy was associated with increased cost and no incremental difference in clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

对于住院的葡萄球菌性烫伤样皮肤综合征(SSSS)患儿,抗生素的最佳治疗方案存在争议。不同的方案可能会抑制毒素并/或对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)或耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)提供额外的覆盖。

目的

描述住院的 SSSS 患儿的抗生素治疗方案,并探讨抗葡萄球菌抗生素方案与患者结局之间的关系。

方法

使用儿科健康信息系统数据库(2011-2016 年)对住院的 SSSS 患儿进行回顾性队列研究。纳入接受克林霉素单药治疗、克林霉素加 MSSA 覆盖(如萘夫西林)或克林霉素加 MRSA 覆盖(如万古霉素)的患儿。主要结局是住院时间(LOS);次要结局是治疗失败和成本。使用广义线性混合效应模型比较抗生素组之间的结局。

结果

在纳入的 1259 名患儿中,828 名患儿接受了最常见的抗葡萄球菌抗生素方案:克林霉素单药治疗(47%)、克林霉素加 MSSA 覆盖(33%)和克林霉素加 MRSA 覆盖(20%)。与克林霉素单药治疗(28%)和克林霉素加 MSSA(32%)相比,接受克林霉素加 MRSA 覆盖的患儿病情严重程度更高(44%)(P=.001)。在调整后的分析中,3 种方案的 LOS 和治疗失败率没有差异(P=.42 和 P=.26)。接受克林霉素单药治疗的患儿成本明显更低,而接受克林霉素加 MRSA 覆盖的患儿成本最高(分别为$4839 和$5348;P<.001)。

结论

在 SSSS 患儿中,克林霉素单药治疗中添加 MSSA 或 MRSA 覆盖与成本增加相关,而临床结局无明显差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验