Suppr超能文献

加拿大胃肠病学协会炎症性肠病患者免疫接种临床实践指南(IBD)-第 1 部分:活疫苗。

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline for Immunizations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-Part 1: Live Vaccines.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, CHEO Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, and CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):669-680.e0. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.079. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable diseases. The effectiveness and safety of vaccinations may be altered by immunosuppressive therapies or IBD itself. These recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on immunizations in adult and pediatric patients with IBD. This publication focused on live vaccines.

METHODS

Systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of vaccines in patients with IBD, other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and the general population were performed. Critical outcomes included mortality, vaccine-preventable diseases, and serious adverse events. Immunogenicity was considered a surrogate outcome for vaccine efficacy. Certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Key questions were developed through an iterative process and voted on by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations were formulated using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. Strong recommendation means that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, whereas a conditional recommendation means that different choices will be appropriate for different patients.

RESULTS

Three good practice statements included reviewing a patient's vaccination status at diagnosis and at regular intervals, giving appropriate vaccinations as soon as possible, and not delaying urgently needed immunosuppressive therapy to provide vaccinations. There are 4 recommendations on the use of live vaccines. Measles, mumps, rubella vaccine is recommended for both adult and pediatric patients with IBD not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications (conditional). Varicella vaccine is recommended for pediatric patients with IBD not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications (conditional). For adults, recommendations are conditionally in favor of varicella vaccine for those not on immunosuppressive therapy, and against for those on therapy. No recommendation was made regarding the use of live vaccines in infants born to mothers using biologics because the desirable and undesirable effects were closely balanced and the evidence was insufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining appropriate vaccination status in patients with IBD is critical to optimize patient outcomes. In general, live vaccines are recommended in patients not on immunosuppressive therapy, but not for those using immunosuppressive medications. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of live vaccines in patients on immunosuppressive therapy.

摘要

背景与目的

炎症性肠病(IBD)患者可能面临某些可通过疫苗预防的疾病的更高风险。免疫抑制疗法或 IBD 本身可能会改变疫苗的有效性和安全性。这些由加拿大胃肠病学协会制定并得到美国胃肠病学协会认可的建议旨在为 IBD 成人和儿科患者的免疫接种提供指导。本出版物侧重于活疫苗。

方法

对评估 IBD 患者、其他免疫介导的炎症性疾病患者和一般人群中疫苗的疗效、有效性和安全性的系统评价进行了评估。关键结果包括死亡率、疫苗可预防疾病和严重不良事件。免疫原性被认为是疫苗疗效的替代结果。根据 GRADE(推荐评估、制定与评价)方法对证据确定性和建议强度进行了评级。通过迭代过程制定了关键问题,并由多学科小组进行投票。使用证据决策框架制定建议。强烈推荐意味着大多数患者应该接受推荐的治疗方案,而有条件的推荐则意味着不同的患者需要不同的选择。

结果

三项良好实践声明包括在诊断时和定期复查患者的疫苗接种状况、尽快给予适当的疫苗接种以及不因接种疫苗而延迟急需的免疫抑制治疗。有 4 项关于使用活疫苗的建议。对于未接受免疫抑制治疗的成人和儿科 IBD 患者,建议接种麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹疫苗,但不建议使用免疫抑制药物的患者接种(有条件)。对于未接受免疫抑制治疗的儿科 IBD 患者,建议接种水痘疫苗,但不建议使用免疫抑制药物的患者接种(有条件)。对于成年人,如果不接受免疫抑制治疗,则有条件地推荐接种水痘疫苗,但如果正在接受治疗,则不推荐接种。由于理想效果和不良效果密切平衡且证据不足,因此对于使用生物制剂的母亲所生婴儿使用活疫苗,没有建议。

结论

维持 IBD 患者的适当疫苗接种状态对于优化患者结局至关重要。一般来说,不接受免疫抑制治疗的患者推荐使用活疫苗,但不建议接受免疫抑制治疗的患者使用。需要进一步研究来评估免疫抑制治疗患者使用活疫苗的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验