Zhang Qin, Wang Yixuan, Jiang Xiaoxu, Xu Huaizhou, Luo Yiqun, Long Tingting, Li Jun, Xing Liqun
Jiangsu International Environmental Development Center, No.176 Jiangdong North Road, Nanjing, 210036, China.
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, No.8 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, China.
Environ Pollut. 2021 May 1;276:116729. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116729. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
The environmental load of organophosphate ester (OPE) flame retardants has caused a series of problems due to their extensive use. The soil matrix, as an ultimate sink for organic pollution, plays a vital part in the fate of OPEs in the environment. In this study, the spatial occurrence, composition profile and health risk of 13 OPE species in farmland soils from four provinces of China were characterized. Excluding tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate (TDBPP) and ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP), the remaining eleven OPEs had a high detection frequency (DF) ranging from 60% to 100%. The range of total OPE (ΣOPE) concentrations were 62.3-394 ng/g dry weight (dw), with a median of 228 ng/g dw. Among these OPEs, tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP) with a median of 143 ng/g dw) was the predominant species, followed by tricresyl phosphate (TCP; median of 20.1 ng/g dw) and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP; median of 17.9 ng/g dw). In terms of geographical distribution, significantly lower OPEs levels were found in samples from Heilongjiang (159 ± 47.0 ng/g dw) than in those of Guangxi (264 ± 66.0 ng/g dw), Henan (252 ± 74.5 ng/g dw) and Hubei (242 ± 52.8 ng/g dw) provinces. Principal component analysis and Spearman's correlations were used to reveal potential sources of OPEs in the different provincial regions. Health risk exposure to OPEs in farmland soils was at an acceptable level (<1.20 × 10 for non-carcinogenic risk to children as the most sensitive age group; and <6.47 × 10 for carcinogenic risk to adults as the most sensitive age group) at the present detected concentrations. However, TCEP and TEHP, the predominant risk contributors, should be paid more attention.
由于有机磷酸酯(OPE)类阻燃剂的广泛使用,其环境负荷引发了一系列问题。土壤基质作为有机污染物的最终归宿,在OPEs在环境中的归趋中起着至关重要的作用。本研究对中国四个省份农田土壤中13种OPEs的空间分布、组成特征及健康风险进行了表征。除磷酸三(2,3 -二溴丙基)酯(TDBPP)和磷酸二苯基单(2 -乙基己基)酯(EHDPP)外,其余11种OPEs的检出频率(DF)较高,范围为60%至100%。总OPE(ΣOPE)浓度范围为62.3 - 394纳克/克干重(dw),中位数为228纳克/克dw。在这些OPEs中,磷酸三(2 -乙基己基)酯(TEHP,中位数为143纳克/克dw)是主要成分,其次是磷酸三甲苯酯(TCP;中位数为20.1纳克/克dw)和磷酸三(2 -氯乙基)酯(TCEP;中位数为17.9纳克/克dw)。在地理分布方面,黑龙江省(159±47.0纳克/克dw)样品中的OPEs水平显著低于广西省(264±66.0纳克/克dw)、河南省(252±74.5纳克/克dw)和湖北省(242±52.8纳克/克dw)。采用主成分分析和Spearman相关性分析揭示不同省份地区OPEs的潜在来源。在目前检测到的浓度下,农田土壤中OPEs对健康的风险暴露处于可接受水平(对于最敏感年龄组儿童的非致癌风险<1.20×10;对于最敏感年龄组成人的致癌风险<6.47×10)。然而,作为主要风险贡献者的TCEP和TEHP应得到更多关注。