Suppr超能文献

孤立性脾钝性创伤后脾脏保留:血管栓塞悖论。

Splenic preservation after isolated splenic blunt trauma: The angioembolization paradox.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.

Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Surgery. 2021 Aug;170(2):628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. The management for splenic trauma includes nonoperative management, splenectomy, and splenic artery angioembolization. The aim of this study is to investigate recent trends in the usage of splenic artery angioembolization in patients with isolated blunt splenic trauma.

METHODS

Adult patients (age >15) with isolated blunt splenic trauma were identified from the National Trauma Databank (2007-2015) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. The defined groups included nonoperative management, splenectomy, and splenic artery angioembolization. Patient variables collected included year of traumatic injury, age, sex, race, insurance status, and geographic region. Clinical variables collected included vital signs (systolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate) recorded upon arrival to the emergency room, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity scores, diagnoses, procedures, and mechanism. Outcome measures included mortality, hospital duration of stay, and complications. We performed 2 independent Poisson logistic regression models to assess relative risk for both splenectomy and angioembolization.

RESULTS

A total of 10,812 patients were included in the analysis (nonoperative management: 7,920; splenectomy: 2,083; angioembolization: 809). Angioembolization proportion increased from 2007 (4.6%) to 2015 (10%), while splenectomy proportion remained unchanged (19.2% to 18.3%). Poisson logistic regression suggests the adjusted probability of receiving angioembolization for a splenic injury increased year-to-year, while the adjusted probability of receiving a splenectomy remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

The use of angioembolization for isolated blunt splenic injuries has increased over the past decade without a reciprocal change in splenectomy. Based on this study, angioembolization may be an overused resource without a significant benefit.

摘要

背景

脾脏是钝性腹部创伤中最常受伤的器官。脾外伤的处理包括非手术治疗、脾切除术和脾动脉血管栓塞术。本研究旨在探讨孤立性钝性脾外伤患者脾动脉血管栓塞术的应用趋势。

方法

从国家创伤数据库(2007-2015 年)中使用国际疾病分类第 9 版代码识别出孤立性钝性脾外伤的成年患者。定义的组包括非手术治疗、脾切除术和脾动脉血管栓塞术。收集的患者变量包括创伤发生年份、年龄、性别、种族、保险状况和地理位置。收集的临床变量包括到达急诊室时记录的生命体征(收缩压、脉搏、呼吸频率)、损伤严重程度评分、简明损伤严重程度评分、诊断、手术和机制。结局指标包括死亡率、住院时间和并发症。我们进行了 2 项独立的泊松逻辑回归模型,以评估脾切除术和血管栓塞术的相对风险。

结果

共有 10812 例患者纳入分析(非手术治疗:7920 例;脾切除术:2083 例;血管栓塞术:809 例)。血管栓塞术的比例从 2007 年(4.6%)增加到 2015 年(10%),而脾切除术的比例保持不变(19.2%到 18.3%)。泊松逻辑回归表明,脾损伤接受血管栓塞治疗的调整后概率逐年增加,而接受脾切除术的调整后概率保持不变。

结论

在过去十年中,孤立性钝性脾外伤血管栓塞术的应用有所增加,而脾切除术的比例没有变化。基于本研究,血管栓塞术的应用可能过度,而没有显著获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验