Rahman Shadab A, Sullivan Jason P, Barger Laura K, St Hilaire Melissa A, O'Brien Conor S, Stone Katie L, Phillips Andrew J K, Klerman Elizabeth B, Qadri Salim, Wright Kenneth P, Halbower Ann C, Segar Jeffrey L, McGuire John K, Vitiello Michael V, de la Iglesia Horacio O, Poynter Sue E, Yu Pearl L, Sanderson Amy L, Zee Phyllis C, Landrigan Christopher P, Czeisler Charles A, Lockley Steven W
Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;
Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-009936. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Extended-duration work rosters (EDWRs) with shifts of 24+ hours impair performance compared with rapid cycling work rosters (RCWRs) that limit shifts to 16 hours in postgraduate year (PGY) 1 resident-physicians. We examined the impact of a RCWR on PGY 2 and PGY 3 resident-physicians.
Data from 294 resident-physicians were analyzed from a multicenter clinical trial of 6 US PICUs. Resident-physicians worked 4-week EDWRs with shifts of 24+ hours every third or fourth shift, or an RCWR in which most shifts were ≤16 consecutive hours. Participants completed a daily sleep and work log and the 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Task and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale 2 to 5 times per shift approximately once per week as operational demands allowed.
Overall, the mean (± SE) number of attentional failures was significantly higher ( =.01) on the EDWR (6.8 ± 1.0) compared with RCWR (2.9 ± 0.7). Reaction time and subjective alertness were also significantly higher, by ∼18% and ∼9%, respectively (both <.0001). These differences were sustained across the 4-week rotation. Moreover, attentional failures were associated with resident-physician-related serious medical errors (SMEs) ( =.04). Although a higher rate of SMEs was observed under the RCWR, after adjusting for workload, RCWR had a protective effect on the rate of SMEs (rate ratio 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.77]).
Performance impairment due to EDWR is improved by limiting shift duration. These data and their correlation with SME rates highlight the impairment of neurobehavioral performance due to extended-duration shifts and have important implications for patient safety.
与快速循环工作排班表(RCWRs)相比,轮班时长超过24小时的延长时长工作排班表(EDWRs)会损害一年级住院医师的工作表现,RCWRs将轮班时长限制在16小时。我们研究了RCWR对二年级和三年级住院医师的影响。
对来自美国6个重症监护病房(PICUs)的多中心临床试验中的294名住院医师的数据进行分析。住院医师采用4周的EDWRs,每隔第三或第四班进行时长超过24小时的轮班,或采用RCWR,其中大多数轮班时长≤16小时。参与者在每班大约每周一次的时间里,根据工作需求,完成每日睡眠和工作记录以及10分钟的精神运动警觉任务和卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表2至5次。
总体而言,与RCWR(2.9±0.7)相比,EDWR(6.8±1.0)上注意力不集中失误的平均(±标准误)次数显著更高(P = 0.01)。反应时间和主观警觉性也显著更高,分别高出约18%和约9%(均P < 0.0001)。这些差异在4周的轮转期间持续存在。此外,注意力不集中失误与住院医师相关的严重医疗差错(SMEs)相关(P = 0.04)。虽然在RCWR下观察到的SMEs发生率较高,但在调整工作量后,RCWR对SMEs发生率具有保护作用(发生率比0.48 [95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.77])。
通过限制轮班时长可改善因EDWR导致的工作表现受损。这些数据及其与SMEs发生率的相关性突出了延长时长轮班对神经行为表现的损害,并对患者安全具有重要意义。