Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital del Mar - Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Enfermedades del Corazón, IMIM (Instituto Hospital del Mar de Investigaciones Médicas), Barcelona, Spain.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 27;10(8):926-932. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa029.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively rare but well-known cause of acute coronary syndrome. Clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes of SCAD in old patients (>65 years of age) remain unknown.
The Spanish multicentre prospective SCAD registry (NCT03607981), included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD. Data were collected between June 2015 and April 2019. All angiograms were analysed in a centralized corelab. For the purposes of this study, patients were classified according to age in two groups <65 and ≥65 years old and in-hospital outcomes were analysed. Fifty-five patients (17%) were ≥65 years old (95% women). Older patients had more often hypertension (76% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) and dyslipidaemia (56% vs. 30%, P < 0.01), and less previous (4% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) or current smoking habit (4% vs. 33%, P < 0.001). An identifiable trigger was less often present in old patients (27% vs. 43%, P = 0.028). They also had more often severe coronary tortuosity (36% vs. 11%, P = 0.036) and showed more frequently coronary ectasia (24% vs. 9%, P < 0.01). Older patients were more often managed conservatively (89% vs. 75%, P = 0.025), with no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events during index admission (7% vs. 8%, P = 0.858). There were no differences between groups in terms of in-hospital stay, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary angiography or heart failure.
Older patients with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared with younger patients. Initial treatment strategy was different between groups, though in-hospital outcomes do not significantly differ (NCT03607981).
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是一种相对罕见但广为人知的急性冠状动脉综合征的病因。老年患者(>65 岁)的 SCAD 的临床特征、血管造影表现、治疗和结局仍不清楚。
西班牙多中心前瞻性 SCAD 注册研究(NCT03607981)纳入了 318 例连续的 SCAD 患者。数据收集于 2015 年 6 月至 2019 年 4 月之间。所有的血管造影均在一个集中的核心实验室进行分析。为了本研究的目的,根据年龄将患者分为<65 岁和≥65 岁两组,并分析住院期间的结局。55 名患者(17%)年龄≥65 岁(95%为女性)。老年患者更常患有高血压(76% vs. 29%,P<0.01)和血脂异常(56% vs. 30%,P<0.01),且既往(4% vs. 18%,P<0.001)或当前吸烟习惯(4% vs. 33%,P<0.001)较少。在老年患者中,可识别的诱因更少见(27% vs. 43%,P=0.028)。他们也更常出现严重的冠状动脉迂曲(36% vs. 11%,P=0.036)和更频繁的冠状动脉扩张(24% vs. 9%,P<0.01)。老年患者更常接受保守治疗(89% vs. 75%,P=0.025),但在指数住院期间,主要不良心脏事件无显著差异(7% vs. 8%,P=0.858)。两组在住院时间、新发急性心肌梗死、非计划性冠状动脉造影或心力衰竭方面无差异。
与年轻患者相比,SCAD 老年患者的临床和血管造影特征不同。尽管两组的院内结局无显著差异(NCT03607981),但初始治疗策略不同。