Antonelli Alessandro, Veccia Alessandro, Morena Tonino, Furlan Maria, Peroni Angelo, Simeone Claudio
Urology Unit, Urology Unit AUOI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Urology Unit ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Mar-Apr;47(2):684-685. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0749.
: Vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF) is a rare event in Western countries and are mainly consequent to iatrogenic injuries (1, 2). When conservative management fails, surgical repair is needed, although timing and surgical approach (open or minimally invasive (3)) are still controversial (4, 5). Herein we present a step-by-step description of robot-assisted vesico-vaginal fistula repair.
: From 2015 to 2018 six patients underwent robotic vesico-vaginal fistula repair. Pre-operative cystoscopy was performed to identify the fistulous tract. The ureters were stented. A small catheter was inserted in the fistula. A longitudinal cystotomy was performed, then a dissection of the posterior bladder from the anterior vaginal wall was performed and the fistolous tract was excised. The vagina was sutured horizontally. Four patients underwent omental flap and two pericolic fat interposition. The bladder was closed with a double-layer suture.
: All the vesico-vaginal fistulas developed after previous gynaecological surgery. The median operative time was 160 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) (146-177)]. Intraoperative blood loss was 25 (IQR 0-50) mL. No post-operative complications were recorded. Ureteral stents were removed at 4th post-operative day. Catheter was removed 13 (IQR 11-15) days after surgery after cystography assessment. One patient had Clavien I complication (ileus). Surgical pathology report was negative. No fistula recurrence was reported during follow-up.
: In our experience, robot-assisted fistula repair is a feasible and safe procedure. It presents the advantages of minimally invasive approaches and seems to provide low morbidity and good outcomes. Compared to transvaginal approach, the robotics allows to manage more complex cases with high success rate (6).
膀胱阴道瘘(VVF)在西方国家是一种罕见的病症,主要由医源性损伤引起(1, 2)。当保守治疗失败时,尽管手术时机和手术方式(开放手术或微创手术(3))仍存在争议(4, 5),但仍需要进行手术修复。在此,我们将逐步介绍机器人辅助膀胱阴道瘘修复术。
2015年至2018年期间,6例患者接受了机器人辅助膀胱阴道瘘修复术。术前进行膀胱镜检查以确定瘘管通道。输尿管置入支架。在瘘管中插入一根小导管。进行纵向膀胱切开术,然后从阴道前壁分离膀胱后壁并切除瘘管通道。阴道水平缝合。4例患者采用网膜瓣修复,2例采用结肠旁脂肪置入修复。膀胱用双层缝合关闭。
所有膀胱阴道瘘均发生于既往妇科手术后。中位手术时间为160分钟[四分位间距(IQR)(146 - 177)]。术中失血25(IQR 0 - 50)毫升。未记录到术后并发症。术后第4天取出输尿管支架。术后经膀胱造影评估,13(IQR 11 - 15)天后拔除导尿管。1例患者出现Clavien I级并发症(肠梗阻)。手术病理报告为阴性。随访期间未报告瘘管复发。
根据我们的经验,机器人辅助瘘管修复术是一种可行且安全的手术。它具有微创手术的优点,似乎发病率低且效果良好。与经阴道手术相比,机器人手术能够成功处理更复杂的病例(6)。