Department of Biophysics, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
Department of Biophysics, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia.
J Plant Physiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;258-259:153377. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153377. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
Mechanisms of the specific systemic response of plant to different adverse factors are poorly understood. We studied the mechanisms acting in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under the action of local burn and gradual heating. Both stimuli induce a variation potential (VP) propagation and a biphasic (fast and long-term phases) photosynthetic response in non-stimulated zones of plant with stimulus-specific parameters of the latter: the fast phase or long-term phase predominance in responses induced by burn or heating, respectively. The burn-induced VP and photosynthetic response attenuate with distance, while the heating-induced VP and photosynthetic response were of more stable amplitude in distant part of the stimulated plant. VP propagation in both cases induced apoplast alkalization with dynamics well corresponding to such of VP and of the fast phase of photosynthetic response. Gradual heating induced a significant rise in jasmonate production along with a decrease in stomatal conductance with characteristic times well corresponding to the long-term phase of the photosynthetic response. We suppose that the VP-induced pH shift is responsible for in the induction of the fast phase, while jasmonate production for the long-term phase of the photosynthetic response. The revealed differences in the systemic response to stressors studied, apparently, reflect two distinct plant adaptation strategies to fast and slow-growing stimuli. The immediate response in the tissue nearest to the damage zone is the most important under a fast-growing stimulus. The fundamentally different situation is under a slowly-growing stimulus which provokes long-term changes in the plant that ensure the preparation of the whole organism for impending environmental changes.
植物对不同逆境因素的特异性系统响应机制还不太清楚。我们研究了局部灼伤和逐渐加热作用下小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)的作用机制。这两种刺激都会在植物的非刺激区诱导产生变异电位(VP)传播和光和作用的双相(快速和长期相)响应,后者具有刺激特异性参数:由灼伤或加热引起的快速相或长期相优势。灼伤诱导的 VP 和光和作用响应随距离衰减,而加热诱导的 VP 和光和作用响应在受刺激植物的较远部位具有更稳定的幅度。在这两种情况下,VP 传播都会诱导质外体碱化,其动力学与 VP 和光和作用的快速相很好地对应。逐渐加热会导致茉莉酸的产生显著增加,同时气孔导度下降,其特征时间与光和作用的长期相很好地对应。我们假设 VP 诱导的 pH 变化负责诱导快速相,而茉莉酸的产生则负责光和作用的长期相。所研究的胁迫因素的系统响应的差异,显然反映了植物对快速和慢速生长刺激的两种不同适应策略。在快速生长的刺激下,靠近损伤区的组织的即时响应是最重要的。在缓慢生长的刺激下,情况则完全不同,它会引发植物的长期变化,从而为整个生物体为即将到来的环境变化做好准备。