• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病风险测试在员工健康筛查中识别糖尿病前期的效果评估。

Evaluation of the Use of a Diabetes Risk Test to Identify Prediabetes in an Employee Wellness Screening.

机构信息

219251Presbyterian College School of Pharmacy, Clinton, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2022 Aug;35(4):524-527. doi: 10.1177/0897190021997010. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1177/0897190021997010
PMID:33622071
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Risk Test (DRT) is a screening tool to identify people at risk for developing diabetes. Individuals with a DRT score of 5 or higher may have prediabetes or diabetes and should see a healthcare provider.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how many additional employees are identified as being at risk for developing diabetes during an employee wellness screening by using a more stringent DRT cutoff score of 4 instead of 5.

METHODS

During an annual employee wellness screening event, a hemoglobin A1C (A1c) was drawn for participants with a DRT score of 4 or by request regardless of risk score. A1C values were classified as normal (<5.7%), prediabetes (>5.7 and <6.5%) or diabetes (>6.5%). Risk scores and A1C values were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Cost of additional laboratory testing was also reviewed.

RESULTS

An A1C was collected for 158 participants. Fourteen of 50 (28%) participants with a DRT of 4 had A1c values in the prediabetes range and no history of diabetes or prediabetes. Using the lower DRT score of 4 resulted in an additional expenditure of $305 with $85.40 resulting in the identification of an otherwise unaware person at risk for developing diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Using a DRT cutoff score of 4 as part of an employee wellness screening program resulted in additional laboratory costs to identify persons at risk for developing diabetes but also allowed for earlier education to slow or stop the progression to diabetes which may reduce healthcare costs over time.

摘要

背景

美国糖尿病协会(ADA)糖尿病风险测试(DRT)是一种用于识别有发展为糖尿病风险的人群的筛查工具。DRT 得分在 5 分或以上的个体可能患有前期糖尿病或糖尿病,应咨询医疗保健提供者。

目的

通过使用更严格的 DRT 截断分数 4 而非 5,确定在员工健康筛查期间,有多少额外的员工被确定为有发展为糖尿病的风险。

方法

在年度员工健康筛查活动期间,对于 DRT 得分在 4 分或以上的参与者,或根据请求抽取血红蛋白 A1C(A1c),无论风险评分如何。A1C 值分为正常(<5.7%)、前期糖尿病(>5.7%且<6.5%)或糖尿病(>6.5%)。使用描述性统计分析风险评分和 A1C 值。还审查了额外实验室测试的成本。

结果

对 158 名参与者进行了 A1c 检测。在 DRT 为 4 的 50 名参与者中,有 14 名(28%)的 A1c 值处于前期糖尿病范围,且没有糖尿病或前期糖尿病病史。使用较低的 DRT 得分 4 会导致额外支出 305 美元,其中 85.40 美元用于识别一个原本不知道有患糖尿病风险的人。

结论

将 DRT 截断分数设为 4 作为员工健康筛查计划的一部分,会导致额外的实验室成本来识别有发展为糖尿病风险的人,但也可以更早地进行教育,以减缓或阻止糖尿病的发展,从而随着时间的推移降低医疗保健成本。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Use of a Diabetes Risk Test to Identify Prediabetes in an Employee Wellness Screening.糖尿病风险测试在员工健康筛查中识别糖尿病前期的效果评估。
J Pharm Pract. 2022 Aug;35(4):524-527. doi: 10.1177/0897190021997010. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Sensitivity and specificity of glycated hemoglobin as a diagnostic test for diabetes and prediabetes in Arabs.糖化血红蛋白作为阿拉伯人糖尿病和糖尿病前期诊断试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Oct;96(10):E1680-3. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1148. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
3
Comparison of 3 risk factor-based screening tools for the identification of prediabetes.基于3种风险因素的筛查工具用于识别糖尿病前期的比较。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 May-Jun;60(3):481-484. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
4
Optimal Glycated Hemoglobin Cutoff Point for Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes in Iranian Adults.伊朗成年人诊断 2 型糖尿病的最佳糖化血红蛋白切点。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Dec;42(6):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
Screening for HbA1c-defined prediabetes and diabetes in an at-risk greek population: performance comparison of random capillary glucose, the ADA diabetes risk test and skin fluorescence spectroscopy.在高危希腊人群中进行基于 HbA1c 的糖尿病前期和糖尿病筛查:随机毛细血管葡萄糖、ADA 糖尿病风险测试和皮肤荧光光谱学的性能比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;100(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
6
Optimal Hemoglobin A1c Levels for Screening of Diabetes and Prediabetes in the Japanese Population.日本人群中用于筛查糖尿病和糖尿病前期的最佳糖化血红蛋白水平
J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:932057. doi: 10.1155/2015/932057. Epub 2015 May 31.
7
Identification of previously undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes in the inpatient setting using risk factor and hemoglobin A1C screening.利用风险因素和糖化血红蛋白筛查在住院患者中识别先前未诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期。
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Nov;48(11):1434-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028014547383. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
8
Identifying a Potential Screening Tool for Prediabetes: The Association of Hemoglobin A1c and a Test of Physical Fitness.确定一种潜在的糖尿病前期筛查工具:糖化血红蛋白与体能测试的关联
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(3-4):e139-e142. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy207.
9
Comparing point-of-care A1C and random plasma glucose for screening diabetes in migrant farm workers.比较即时检测糖化血红蛋白和随机血浆葡萄糖用于筛查农民工糖尿病。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 May-Jun;53(3):261-6. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12102.
10
Description of a pharmacist-led diabetes prevention service within an employer-based wellness program.描述一项雇主健康计划中由药剂师主导的糖尿病预防服务。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 Sep-Oct;59(5):736-741. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of the Córdoba Equation for Estimating Body Fat When Determining the Level of Risk of Developing Diabetes Type 2 or Prediabetes.在确定2型糖尿病或糖尿病前期发病风险水平时,科尔多瓦方程在估算体脂方面的实用性。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 27;61(4):613. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040613.
2
The Monthly Cycling of Food Insecurity in Latinas at Risk for Diabetes: Methods, Retention, and Sample Characteristics for a Microlongitudinal Design.拉丁裔糖尿病高危女性粮食不安全状况的月度周期性变化:微纵向设计的方法、样本留存率及样本特征
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 28;9:e66970. doi: 10.2196/66970.