• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人护理院开展的随机对照试验个体参与者数据存储库开发方案(虚拟国际护理院试验档案(VICHTA))。

Protocol for the development of a repository of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials conducted in adult care homes (the Virtual International Care Homes Trials Archive (VICHTA)).

机构信息

Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Feb 23;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05107-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05107-w
PMID:33622396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7900798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 418,000 people live in care homes in the UK, yet accessible, robust data on care home populations and organisation are lacking. This hampers our ability to plan, allocate resources or prevent risk. Large randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in care homes offer a potential solution. The value of detailed data on residents' demographics, outcomes and contextual information captured in RCTs has yet to be fully realised. Irrespective of the intervention tested, much of the trial data collected overlaps in terms of structured assessments and descriptive information. Given the time and costs required to prospectively collect data in these populations, pooling anonymised RCT data into a structured repository offers benefit; secondary analyses of pooled RCT data can improve understanding of this under-researched population and enhance the future trial design. This protocol describes the creation of a project-specific repository of individual participant data (IPD) from trials conducted in care homes and subsequent expansion into a legacy dataset for wider use, to address the need for accurate, high-quality IPD on this vulnerable population.

METHODS

Informed by scoping of relevant literature, the principal investigators of RCTs conducted in adult care homes in the UK since 2010 will be invited to contribute trial IPD. Contributing trialists will form a Steering Committee who will oversee data sharing and remain gatekeepers of their own trial's data. IPD will be cleaned and standardised in consultation with the Steering Committee for accuracy. Planned analyses include a comparison of pooled IPD with point estimates from administrative sources, to assess generalisability of RCT data to the wider care home population. We will also identify key resident characteristics and outcomes from within the trial repository, which will inform the development of a national minimum dataset for care homes. Following project completion, management will migrate to the Virtual Trials Archives, forming a legacy dataset which will be expanded to include international RCTs, and will be accessible to the wider research community for analyses.

DISCUSSION

Analysis of pooled IPD has the potential to inform and direct future practice, research and policy at low cost, enhancing the value of existing data and reducing research waste. We aim to create a permanent archive for care home trial data and welcome the contribution of emerging trial datasets.

摘要

背景

英国约有 41.8 万人居住在养老院,但缺乏关于养老院人群和组织的可访问、可靠数据。这阻碍了我们规划、分配资源或预防风险的能力。在养老院进行的大型随机对照试验 (RCT) 提供了一种潜在的解决方案。在 RCT 中收集的关于居民人口统计学、结果和背景信息的详细数据的价值尚未得到充分实现。无论测试的干预措施如何,收集的试验数据大部分在结构化评估和描述性信息方面都有重叠。鉴于在这些人群中前瞻性收集数据所需的时间和成本,将匿名化的 RCT 数据汇总到一个结构化存储库中具有优势;对汇总的 RCT 数据进行二次分析可以提高对这一研究不足人群的理解,并增强未来的试验设计。本方案描述了从英国自 2010 年以来在成人护理院进行的 RCT 中创建特定于项目的个体参与者数据 (IPD) 存储库,并随后扩展为更广泛使用的遗留数据集,以满足对这一脆弱人群进行准确、高质量 IPD 的需求。

方法

根据对相关文献的范围界定,将邀请自 2010 年以来在英国成人护理院进行的 RCT 的主要研究者贡献试验 IPD。参与的试验人员将组成指导委员会,负责监督数据共享并保持对自己试验数据的控制权。将与指导委员会协商对 IPD 进行清理和标准化,以确保准确性。计划分析包括对汇总的 IPD 与来自行政来源的点估计值进行比较,以评估 RCT 数据对更广泛的养老院人群的普遍性。我们还将从试验存储库中确定关键居民特征和结果,这将为养老院国家最小数据集的开发提供信息。项目完成后,管理层将迁移到虚拟试验档案,形成一个遗留数据集,该数据集将扩展到包括国际 RCT,并可供更广泛的研究界进行分析。

讨论

汇总 IPD 的分析有可能以低成本为未来的实践、研究和政策提供信息和指导,提高现有数据的价值并减少研究浪费。我们旨在为养老院试验数据创建一个永久性档案,并欢迎新兴试验数据集的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386d/7901114/efac16a08f76/13063_2021_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386d/7901114/efac16a08f76/13063_2021_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/386d/7901114/efac16a08f76/13063_2021_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol for the development of a repository of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials conducted in adult care homes (the Virtual International Care Homes Trials Archive (VICHTA)).成人护理院开展的随机对照试验个体参与者数据存储库开发方案(虚拟国际护理院试验档案(VICHTA))。
Trials. 2021 Feb 23;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05107-w.
2
Data resource profile: the virtual international care homes trials archive (VICHTA).数据资源简介:虚拟国际养老院试验档案(VICHTA)。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Jan 15;8(6):2161. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i6.2161. eCollection 2023.
3
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for chronic heart failure: the EXTRAMATCH II individual participant data meta-analysis.基于运动的慢性心力衰竭心脏康复:EXTRAMATCH II 个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(25):1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta23250.
4
5
Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study.照顾家居环境中独立药剂师处方的群组随机对照试验的效果和成本效益的进程评估议定书:CHIPPS 研究。
Trials. 2020 May 29;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04264-8.
6
Protocol of the process evaluation of cluster randomised control trial for estimating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a complex intervention to increase care home staff influenza vaccination rates compared to usual practice (FluCare).群组随机对照试验过程评估方案:评估一项复杂干预措施提高养老院工作人员流感疫苗接种率(与常规做法相比)的效果和成本效益(FluCare)。
Trials. 2023 Sep 15;24(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07613-5.
7
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
8
Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long-term care.机构长期照护中预防老年人谵妄的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD009537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009537.pub3.
9
To share or not to share data: how valid are trials evaluating first-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome?数据共享与否:评估多囊卵巢综合征一线促排卵治疗的试验有多可靠?
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Nov 1;26(6):929-941. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa031.
10
PATCH: posture and mobility training for care staff versus usual care in care homes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.补丁:疗养院护理人员的姿势和活动能力训练与常规护理的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Sep 24;19(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2863-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Data resource profile: the virtual international care homes trials archive (VICHTA).数据资源简介:虚拟国际养老院试验档案(VICHTA)。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Jan 15;8(6):2161. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i6.2161. eCollection 2023.
2
Outcome measures from international older adult care home intervention research: a scoping review.国际老年护理院干预研究的结果测量指标:范围综述。
Age Ageing. 2023 May 1;52(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad069.
3
Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19 and lack of linked datasets for care homes.新冠疫情与护理院缺乏关联数据集的情况。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 24;369:m2463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2463.
2
Oedema extension distance in intracerebral haemorrhage: Association with baseline characteristics and long-term outcome.脑出血中的水肿扩展距离:与基线特征及长期预后的关联
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Sep;4(3):263-270. doi: 10.1177/2396987319848203. Epub 2019 May 30.
3
The impact of population ageing on end-of-life care in Scotland: projections of place of death and recommendations for future service provision.
在英国家庭护理院居住的老年人最小数据集的试行:一项纵向、混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 27;13(2):e071686. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071686.
人口老龄化对苏格兰临终关怀的影响:死亡地点预测及未来服务提供建议。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 12;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0490-x.
4
Open science: The open clinical trials data journey.开放科学:开放临床试验数据之旅。
Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):539-546. doi: 10.1177/1740774519865512. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
5
Accuracy of the short-form Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Systematic review and validation.简易蒙特利尔认知评估量表的准确性:系统评价与验证。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;34(10):1515-1525. doi: 10.1002/gps.5162. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Expanding Eligibility in Stroke Prevention Trials to Patients with Early Disability.扩大中风预防试验中符合条件的患者范围至早期残疾患者。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2268-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 31.
7
An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values.健康相关生活质量测量指标与通用偏好量表关联(或映射)以生成效用值的研究的更新系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Jun;17(3):295-313. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00467-6.
8
Who lives in Scotland's care homes? Descriptive analysis using routinely collected social care data 2012-16.谁住在苏格兰的养老院?利用2012 - 2016年常规收集的社会护理数据进行描述性分析。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2019 Mar;49(1):12-22. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2019.103.
9
Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) model.英格兰老年人口多病共存状况预测至 2035 年:人口老龄化与护理模拟(PACSim)模型的估算。
Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):374-380. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx201.
10
Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials: principles and recommendations.从临床试验中分享和重用个体参与者数据:原则和建议。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018647.