Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;161(2):535-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
To characterize and compare the molecular subtypes and profiles of prospectively-accrued newly-diagnosed early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancers (ECs).
EC patients consented to an IRB-approved protocol of massively parallel sequencing of 410-468 cancer-related genes; 175 ECs of 7 histologic types (n = 135 FIGO stages I/II, n = 40 FIGO stages III/IV) were included. Previously reported sequencing data from 99 additional advanced-stage ECs were retrieved for comparisons.
Irrespective of histologic type, all 175 ECs could be stratified into the molecular subtypes, with 75 (43%) being of p53 wild-type, 49 (28%) MMR-deficient, 39 (22%) p53 abnormal and 12 (7%) of POLE molecular subtypes. Subtype distribution, mutational and copy number profiles varied according to histologic type. In endometrioid ECs, genetic alterations varied according to histologic grade. Potential therapeutic targets, including high tumor mutational burden, ERBB2 amplification and PIK3CA hotspot mutations, were found across histologic types in 63% (n = 110) of all ECs. Compared to their early-stage counterparts, advanced-stage endometrioid ECs had a significantly higher fraction of genome altered (median 0.1% vs 12%, p < 0.001) and ARID1B mutations (0% vs 11%, p = 0.01), and advanced-stage serous ECs harbored more frequent ERBB2 amplification (18% vs 8%, p > 0.05) and PIK3CA mutations (46% vs 27%, p > 0.05). Whole-genome doubling was found in advanced- but not early-stage carcinosarcomas and clear cell carcinomas.
Our findings demonstrate the molecular heterogeneity within and across histologic types of EC and the increased genomic complexity of advanced-stage ECs. Molecular subtypes are present across EC histologic types and may help stratify EC patients for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.
对前瞻性采集的新诊断早期和晚期子宫内膜癌(EC)患者进行分子亚型和特征分析,并进行比较。
EC 患者同意参与一项经 IRB 批准的协议,对 410-468 个与癌症相关的基因进行大规模平行测序;共纳入 7 种组织学类型的 175 例 EC 患者(n=135 例FIGO Ⅰ/Ⅱ期,n=40 例FIGO Ⅲ/Ⅳ期)。同时还检索了另外 99 例晚期 EC 患者的测序数据。
无论组织学类型如何,所有 175 例 EC 均可分为分子亚型,其中 75 例(43%)为 p53 野生型,49 例(28%)为 MMR 缺陷型,39 例(22%)为 p53 异常型,12 例(7%)为 POLE 分子亚型。组织学类型不同,亚型分布、突变和拷贝数谱也存在差异。在子宫内膜样 EC 中,根据组织学分级,遗传改变也存在差异。在所有 175 例 EC 中,有 63%(n=110)发现了潜在的治疗靶点,包括高肿瘤突变负担、ERBB2 扩增和 PIK3CA 热点突变,这些靶点存在于各种组织学类型中。与早期 EC 相比,晚期子宫内膜样 EC 的全基因组改变比例显著更高(中位数 0.1% vs 12%,p<0.001)和 ARID1B 突变(0% vs 11%,p=0.01),晚期浆液性 EC 则更频繁地出现 ERBB2 扩增(18% vs 8%,p>0.05)和 PIK3CA 突变(46% vs 27%,p>0.05)。全基因组倍增仅发生在晚期癌肉瘤和透明细胞癌中,而早期癌肉瘤和透明细胞癌中则未发生。
我们的研究结果表明,EC 不同组织学类型之间存在分子异质性,晚期 EC 存在更高的基因组复杂性。分子亚型存在于 EC 的各种组织学类型中,可能有助于为预后和治疗目的对 EC 患者进行分层。