Department of Pathology.
Department of Pathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 May;44(5):641-648. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001461.
Endometrial carcinoma (EC), as described by Bokhman, has historically been classified as Type I (low-grade, hormone-dependant, young patients, good prognosis) or Type II (high-grade, hormone-independent, older patients, poor prognosis). This classification is no longer pragmatic, however, as EC is a much more heterogeneous disease. Four molecular subtypes of EC were identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), and subsequent studies have demonstrated its utility in predicting prognosis. While endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC), the prototypical Type II EC, largely occurs in older women, younger women with ESC were not accounted for in the Bokhman model and were underrepresented in the TCGA study. We hypothesized that a subset of ESCs in young patients do not represent bona fide serous carcinomas but rather high-grade endometrioid carcinomas mimicking a serous phenotype. We identified ESCs and mixed endometrioid/serous carcinomas in women <60 years (n=37), and analyzed their clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics. Sixteen percent showed mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) and 11% were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome. Additionally, 16% of cases tested harbored a hotspot POLE exonuclease domain mutation (POLE-EDM). Morphologically, 47% of tumors showed confirmatory endometrioid features, including atypical hyperplasia, a low-grade endometrioid carcinoma component, or squamous differentiation. Clinically, the overall survival in patients with MMR-D and POLE-EDM was significantly better than that of patients without these features (P=0.0329). In conclusion, ESCs in young patients comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors, demonstrating diverse clinical, immunohistochemical, morphologic, and molecular features which have implications for prognosis and adjuvant therapy.
子宫内膜癌(EC),如 Bokhman 所述,历史上被分为 I 型(低级别、激素依赖性、年轻患者、预后良好)或 II 型(高级别、激素独立性、老年患者、预后不良)。然而,这种分类不再实用,因为 EC 是一种更为异质性的疾病。TCGA 确定了 EC 的四个分子亚型,随后的研究表明其在预测预后方面具有实用性。虽然子宫内膜浆液性癌(ESC)是典型的 II 型 EC,主要发生在老年女性中,但在 Bokhman 模型中并未考虑到年轻 ESC 患者,并且在 TCGA 研究中代表性不足。我们假设年轻患者中的一部分 ESC 并不代表真正的浆液性癌,而是表现出浆液样表型的高级别子宫内膜样癌。我们在<60 岁的女性中鉴定出 ESC 和混合子宫内膜样/浆液性癌(n=37),并分析了它们的临床、形态学、免疫组织化学和分子特征。16%的病例表现出错配修复缺陷(MMR-D),11%的病例被诊断为 Lynch 综合征。此外,16%的病例检测到热点 POLE 外切酶结构域突变(POLE-EDM)。形态学上,47%的肿瘤表现出明确的子宫内膜样特征,包括不典型增生、低级别子宫内膜样癌成分或鳞状分化。临床上,具有 MMR-D 和 POLE-EDM 的患者的总生存率明显好于没有这些特征的患者(P=0.0329)。总之,年轻患者的 ESC 是一组异质性肿瘤,表现出不同的临床、免疫组织化学、形态学和分子特征,这对预后和辅助治疗具有重要意义。