Suppr超能文献

预防性预防性回肠造口术与预防性结肠造口术在直肠癌前切除术后的发病率和死亡率:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, West Section of Lvshun South Road No. 9, Dalian 116044, China.

Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Boyang Lake Road No. 10, Tianjin 301617, China.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1514-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.030. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative morbidity after anterior resection with diverting loop ileostomy (LI) versus colostomy (LC) and its reversal for rectal cancer. The studies on the application of loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy in anterior resection published from January 2000 to January 2020 were searched in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinical trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included according to inclusion criteria. Eight studies (2 RCTs and 6 cohort studies) totaling 1451 patients (821 LI and 630 LC) were included in the meta-analysis. The morbidity related to stoma formation and closure did not demonstrate significant differences. Significantly more LCs were complicated by stoma prolapse & retraction (OR:0.26,95%CI:0.11-0.60,P = 0.001), parastomal hernia (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01), surgical site infection (SSI) (OR = 0.24,95%CI:0.11-0.49,P < 0.0001) and incisional hernias (OR = 0.39,95%CI:0.19-0.83,P = 0.01) than by LIs. Patients with LI demonstrated significantly more complications related to the stoma, such as dehydration (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01) and ileus (OR = 2.23,95%CI:1.12-4.43, P = 0.02) than patients with LC. While after the subgroup analysis of different publication years, LI could reduce the risk of the morbidity after stoma formation in previous years group (P = 0.04) with a lower heterogeneity (I = 37%); LC could reduce the incidence of parastomal dermatitis in recent years group (P < 0.0001) without heterogeneity in each subgroup (I = 0%). Cumulative meta-analysis detected significant turning points in dehydration, SSI, and ileus. This meta-analysis recommends diverting LI in the anterior resection for rectal cancer, but there is a risk of dehydration, irritant dermatitis, and ileus.

摘要

本荟萃分析的目的是评估直肠前切除术中预防性回肠造口术(LI)与结肠造口术(LC)的围手术期发病率,以及两者术后的转归。我们检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和临床试验数据库中发表的关于回肠造口术与结肠造口术在直肠前切除术中应用的研究。根据纳入标准,纳入所有随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究。最终纳入 8 项研究(2 项 RCT 和 6 项队列研究),共 1451 例患者(821 例 LI 和 630 例 LC)。造口形成和关闭相关的发病率无显著差异。LC 组更易发生造口脱垂/回缩(OR:0.26,95%CI:0.11-0.60,P=0.001)、吻合口旁疝(OR:0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88,P=0.01)、手术部位感染(SSI)(OR:0.24,95%CI:0.11-0.49,P<0.0001)和切口疝(OR:0.39,95%CI:0.19-0.83,P=0.01)。LI 组患者发生与造口相关的并发症(如脱水[OR:0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88,P=0.01]和肠梗阻[OR:2.23,95%CI:1.12-4.43,P=0.02])显著多于 LC 组。但在对不同发表年份的亚组分析中,LI 可降低前几年组造口术后发病率(P=0.04),且异质性较低(I=37%);LC 可降低近年组吻合口旁皮炎的发生率(P<0.0001),且各亚组无异质性(I=0%)。累积荟萃分析发现,脱水、SSI 和肠梗阻的转折点具有统计学意义。该荟萃分析建议在直肠前切除术中使用预防性回肠造口术,但存在脱水、刺激性皮炎和肠梗阻的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验