Visram Alissa, Vaxman Iuliana, S Al Saleh Abdullah, Parmar Harsh, Dispenzieri Angela, Kapoor Prashant, Lacy Martha Q, Gertz Morie A, Buadi Francis K, Hayman Suzanne R, Dingli David, Warsame Rahma, Kourelis Taxiarchis, Siddiqui Mustaqeem, Gonsalves Wilson, Muchtar Eli, Lust John A, Leung Nelson, Kyle Robert A, Murray David, Rajkumar S Vincent, Kumar Shaji
Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
Leukemia. 2021 May;35(5):1428-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01180-x. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
Unlike IgG monoclonal proteins (MCPs), IgA MCP quantification is unreliable due to beta-migration of IgA MCPs on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). The utility of nephelometric quantitative IgA (qIgA) to monitor IgA multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. We retrospectively studied disease response kinetics using qIgA versus MCPs by SPEP, and developed and validated novel qIgA disease assessment criteria in 491 IgA MM patients. The SPEP MCP nadir occurred a median of 41 (IQR 0-102) days before the qIgA. The median time to achieve a partial response (PR) was shorter using standard IMWG versus qIgA response criteria (32 vs 58 days, p < 0.001). Stratification by qIgA criteria, unlike IMWG criteria, led to clear separation of the progression-free survival curves of patients achieving a PR or very good PR. There was a consistent trend toward earlier detection of disease progression using qIgA versus IMWG progression criteria. In conclusion, monitoring IgA MM using MCP-based IMWG criteria may be falsely reassuring, given that MCP levels on SPEP decrease faster than qIgA levels. The qIgA response criteria more accurately stratify patients based on the progression risk and may detect disease progression earlier, which may lead to more consistent measurement of trial endpoints and improved patient outcomes.
与IgG单克隆蛋白(MCP)不同,由于IgA MCP在血清蛋白电泳(SPEP)上的β迁移,IgA MCP的定量检测并不可靠。散射比浊法定量IgA(qIgA)用于监测IgA多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的效用尚不清楚。我们回顾性研究了使用qIgA与通过SPEP检测MCP的疾病反应动力学,并在491例IgA MM患者中制定并验证了新的qIgA疾病评估标准。SPEP检测的MCP最低点出现在qIgA之前的中位数为41天(IQR 0-102)。使用标准国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)标准与qIgA反应标准达到部分缓解(PR)的中位时间较短(32天对58天,p < 0.001)。与IMWG标准不同,根据qIgA标准进行分层可使达到PR或非常好的PR的患者的无进展生存曲线明显分离。使用qIgA与IMWG进展标准相比,在疾病进展的早期检测方面存在一致趋势。总之,鉴于SPEP上的MCP水平比qIgA水平下降得更快,使用基于MCP的IMWG标准监测IgA MM可能会产生错误的安慰效果。qIgA反应标准能根据进展风险更准确地对患者进行分层,并可能更早地检测到疾病进展,这可能导致试验终点的测量更加一致,并改善患者的预后。