Shimizu K, Kamiya O, Hirabayashi N, Ichikawa A, Kawashima K, Kobayashi M, Mizuno H, Nagura E, Nitta M, Saito H, Sao H, Shibata T, Takeyama H
Department of Medicine, Nagoya City Higashi General Hospital, Nagoya.
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999 Mar;90(3):355-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00755.x.
In the present study 142 patients with myeloma (102 with IgG M-protein and 40 with IgA) treated with either VMCP (65 patients) or MMCP (77 patients) as remission induction therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Response to treatment was evaluated in terms of a more-than-50% fall of pretreatment M-protein and the posttreatment M-protein nadir. Though significantly more patients treated with MMCP achieved partial response (PR) as compared with those treated with VMCP (P=0.019) and though patients achieving PR showed a significantly longer survival than those with less responsiveness (P=0.0091), the difference in survival curves between the two treatment groups was not significant (P=0.1871). The difference in response between the treatment groups evaluated in terms of posttreatment nadir was not significant (P=0.507). Multivariate analysis identified posttreatment M-protein nadir as a significant prognostic factor associated with survival, along with 3 other factors: sex, performance status, and hemoglobin. The lack of difference between the survival curves for patients treated with the 2 regimens despite the significantly different response rates evaluated in terms of percent fall of pretreatment M-protein levels was considered to be due to the lack of a difference in the ability to induce a deep posttreatment nadir between the regimens. Posttreatment M-protein nadir is an important prognostic factor associated with survival and should be included in the evaluation of the efficacy of chemotherapy.
在本研究中,对142例骨髓瘤患者(102例为IgG M蛋白型,40例为IgA 型)进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受VMCP方案(65例患者)或MMCP方案(77例患者)作为缓解诱导治疗。根据治疗前M蛋白下降超过50%以及治疗后M蛋白最低点来评估治疗反应。尽管与接受VMCP治疗的患者相比,接受MMCP治疗的患者达到部分缓解(PR)的比例显著更高(P = 0.019),并且达到PR的患者生存期明显长于反应较差的患者(P = 0.0091),但两个治疗组的生存曲线差异不显著(P = 0.1871)。根据治疗后最低点评估的治疗组间反应差异不显著(P = 0.507)。多因素分析确定治疗后M蛋白最低点是与生存相关的重要预后因素,另外还有3个因素:性别、体能状态和血红蛋白。尽管根据治疗前M蛋白水平下降百分比评估的反应率有显著差异,但两种治疗方案治疗的患者生存曲线缺乏差异,这被认为是由于两种方案诱导治疗后最低点深度的能力没有差异。治疗后M蛋白最低点是与生存相关的重要预后因素,应纳入化疗疗效评估。