Suppr超能文献

治疗后M蛋白最低点水平是与多发性骨髓瘤生存相关的一个重要预后因素。名古屋骨髓瘤协作研究组。

Posttreatment M-protein nadir level is a significant prognostic factor associated with survival in multiple myeloma. Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group.

作者信息

Shimizu K, Kamiya O, Hirabayashi N, Ichikawa A, Kawashima K, Kobayashi M, Mizuno H, Nagura E, Nitta M, Saito H, Sao H, Shibata T, Takeyama H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Nagoya City Higashi General Hospital, Nagoya.

出版信息

Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999 Mar;90(3):355-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00755.x.

Abstract

In the present study 142 patients with myeloma (102 with IgG M-protein and 40 with IgA) treated with either VMCP (65 patients) or MMCP (77 patients) as remission induction therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Response to treatment was evaluated in terms of a more-than-50% fall of pretreatment M-protein and the posttreatment M-protein nadir. Though significantly more patients treated with MMCP achieved partial response (PR) as compared with those treated with VMCP (P=0.019) and though patients achieving PR showed a significantly longer survival than those with less responsiveness (P=0.0091), the difference in survival curves between the two treatment groups was not significant (P=0.1871). The difference in response between the treatment groups evaluated in terms of posttreatment nadir was not significant (P=0.507). Multivariate analysis identified posttreatment M-protein nadir as a significant prognostic factor associated with survival, along with 3 other factors: sex, performance status, and hemoglobin. The lack of difference between the survival curves for patients treated with the 2 regimens despite the significantly different response rates evaluated in terms of percent fall of pretreatment M-protein levels was considered to be due to the lack of a difference in the ability to induce a deep posttreatment nadir between the regimens. Posttreatment M-protein nadir is an important prognostic factor associated with survival and should be included in the evaluation of the efficacy of chemotherapy.

摘要

在本研究中,对142例骨髓瘤患者(102例为IgG M蛋白型,40例为IgA 型)进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受VMCP方案(65例患者)或MMCP方案(77例患者)作为缓解诱导治疗。根据治疗前M蛋白下降超过50%以及治疗后M蛋白最低点来评估治疗反应。尽管与接受VMCP治疗的患者相比,接受MMCP治疗的患者达到部分缓解(PR)的比例显著更高(P = 0.019),并且达到PR的患者生存期明显长于反应较差的患者(P = 0.0091),但两个治疗组的生存曲线差异不显著(P = 0.1871)。根据治疗后最低点评估的治疗组间反应差异不显著(P = 0.507)。多因素分析确定治疗后M蛋白最低点是与生存相关的重要预后因素,另外还有3个因素:性别、体能状态和血红蛋白。尽管根据治疗前M蛋白水平下降百分比评估的反应率有显著差异,但两种治疗方案治疗的患者生存曲线缺乏差异,这被认为是由于两种方案诱导治疗后最低点深度的能力没有差异。治疗后M蛋白最低点是与生存相关的重要预后因素,应纳入化疗疗效评估。

相似文献

2
10
A randomized study comparing VMCP and MMPP in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1997;39(4):279-85. doi: 10.1007/s002800050573.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验