• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网中关于脂肪填充的患者信息质量。

Quality of Patient Information on Lipofilling in the Internet.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Esthetic and Hand Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Department of Surgery and Traumatology, GZO Spital Wetzikon AG, Wetzikon, Switzerland; Departments of.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):e86-e90. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002752.

DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002752
PMID:33625156
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients interested in aesthetic surgery actively search the Internet, a source that contains important but biased information.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on autologous fat grafting available on the Internet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The quantitative and qualitative assessment of websites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (EQIP-36 items). Websites were identified through the most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask, and AOL).

RESULTS

After duplicate and irrelevant sources were excluded, 608 remaining websites were assessed. Only 164 websites addressed >17 of the 36 items. Scores tended to be higher for academic centers and professional societies than for websites developed by private practitioners. The EQIP score achieved by websites ranged between 0 to 28, with a median value of 14 points.

CONCLUSION

The quality of patient information on lipofilling available on the Internet is very poor, and research on existing websites reveals substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for sources offering superior quality and unbiased information on lipofilling for patients who intend to undergo this procedure.

摘要

背景

对美容手术感兴趣的患者会积极上网搜索,而互联网上的信息虽然内容重要,但却存在偏差。

目的

本研究旨在评估互联网上关于自体脂肪移植的患者信息质量。

材料和方法

通过改良后的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 工具(EQIP-36 项)对网站进行定量和定性评估。通过最受欢迎的搜索引擎(谷歌、雅虎、必应、Ask、美国在线)来识别网站。

结果

在排除重复和不相关的来源后,评估了 608 个剩余网站。只有 164 个网站涵盖了 36 项中的>17 项。学术中心和专业协会的网站得分往往高于私人从业者开发的网站。网站的 EQIP 评分范围为 0 至 28,中位数为 14 分。

结论

互联网上关于脂肪填充的患者信息质量非常差,对现有网站的研究显示出了明显的缺陷。对于打算接受这种手术的患者来说,迫切需要提供优质且无偏见的关于脂肪填充信息的来源。

相似文献

1
Quality of Patient Information on Lipofilling in the Internet.互联网中关于脂肪填充的患者信息质量。
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):e86-e90. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002752.
2
Carpal tunnel syndrome: Analysis of online patient information with the EQIP tool.腕管综合征:使用EQIP工具对在线患者信息进行分析
Chir Main. 2015 Jun;34(3):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 26.
3
Quality of information for women seeking breast augmentation in the Internet.互联网上寻求隆胸女性的信息质量。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016 Oct;50(5):262-71. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2016.1154469. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet.互联网上正颌外科患者信息质量评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;48(7):661-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Does the Internet Provide Quality Information on Metoidioplasty? Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Online Information on Metoidioplasty.互联网上有关阴道形成术的信息质量如何?利用改良的患者质量信息保障工具评估人工智能生成的和有关阴道形成术的在线信息。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 May 1;92(5S Suppl 3):S361-S365. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003797.
6
Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet.互联网上抽脂患者信息质量的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun 28;4(6):e759. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
A Systematic Quality Assessment of Online Resources on Eyelid Ptosis Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (mEQIP) Tool.采用改良的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients(mEQIP)工具对眼睑下垂相关在线资源进行系统质量评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(9):1688-1697. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03862-0. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Clefts of the lip and palate: is the Internet a trustworthy source of information for patients?唇腭裂:互联网对患者来说是可靠的信息来源吗?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;47(9):1114-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
9
The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA.利用DISCERN和《美国医学会杂志》评估英文网络上舌侧正畸信息的质量。
J Orthod. 2019 Mar;46(1):20-26. doi: 10.1177/1465312518824100. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
10
Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues.关于药物性中期妊娠流产的患者信息网站:质量、适用性及问题的描述性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 10;19(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6380.

引用本文的文献

1
[Internet resources on plantar fasciitis : German-language analysis of the information content of digital sourcess].[关于足底筋膜炎的网络资源:对数字资源信息内容的德语分析]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Jul;54(7):550-557. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04641-8. Epub 2025 Mar 25.