Schroeder Arthritis Institute, University Health Network, 60 Leonard Avenue, 5, Toronto, Ontario, KD-408, Canada.
Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Semin Immunopathol. 2021 Apr;43(2):173-192. doi: 10.1007/s00281-021-00845-0. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
The strong genetic and clinical overlaps between spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have placed much needed focus on the gut-joint axis of inflammation in SpA, leading to three key hypotheses that attempt to unravel this complex relationship. The arthritogenic peptide hypothesis and the aberrant cellular trafficking hypothesis have been put forth to rationalize the manner by which the innate and adaptive immune systems cooperate and converge during SpA pathogenesis. The bacterial dysbiosis hypothesis discusses how changes in the microbiome lead to architectural and immunological consequences in SpA. These theories are not mutually exclusive, but can provide an explanation as to why subclinical gut inflammation may sometimes precede joint inflammation in SpA patients, thereby implying a causal relationship. Such investigations will be important in informing therapeutic decisions which may be common to both SpA and IBD. However, these hypotheses can also offer insights for a coincident inflammatory relationship between the gut and the joint, particularly when assessing the immunological players involved. Insights from understanding how these systems might affect the gut and joint differently will be equally imperative to address where the therapeutic differences lie between the two diseases. Collectively, this knowledge has practical implications in predicting the likelihood of IBD development in SpA or presence of coincident SpA-IBD, uncovering novel therapeutic targets, and redesigning currently approved treatments. It is evident that a multidisciplinary approach between the rheumatology and gastroenterology fields cannot be ignored, when it comes to the care of SpA patients at risk of IBD or vice versa.
强直性脊柱炎(SpA)和炎症性肠病(IBD)之间存在很强的遗传和临床重叠,这使得人们更加关注 SpA 中的肠道-关节炎症轴,从而产生了三个试图阐明这种复杂关系的关键假设。致病肽假说和异常细胞迁移假说被提出,以解释固有和适应性免疫系统在 SpA 发病机制中如何合作和汇聚。细菌失调假说讨论了微生物组的变化如何导致 SpA 中的结构和免疫后果。这些理论并非相互排斥,而是可以解释为什么亚临床肠道炎症有时会先于 SpA 患者的关节炎症,从而暗示存在因果关系。这些研究对于告知治疗决策非常重要,这些决策可能对 SpA 和 IBD 都通用。然而,这些假设也可以为肠道和关节之间同时存在的炎症关系提供见解,特别是在评估涉及的免疫因素时。了解这些系统如何以不同的方式影响肠道和关节同样至关重要,因为这可以确定两种疾病之间的治疗差异所在。总的来说,这些知识在预测 SpA 患者发生 IBD 的可能性或同时存在 SpA-IBD 的可能性、发现新的治疗靶点以及重新设计目前批准的治疗方法方面具有实际意义。显然,在涉及有发生 IBD 风险的 SpA 患者或反之亦然的 SpA 患者的护理时,风湿病学和胃肠病学领域之间的多学科方法不容忽视。