Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation (COIN), Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbian Way, S-152, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Room BB1644, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):1046-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01119-5. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Shared decision making is an important implementation "pull" strategy for increasing uptake of evidence-based mental health practices. In this qualitative study, we explored provider perspectives on implementing shared decision making at the point of mental health treatment initiation using a publicly available, patient-facing decision support tool for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 mental health providers (psychiatrists, nurses, psychologists, and social workers) working in one of five VA primary care clinics. Interviewed were analyzed using thematic analysis. Provider were enthusiastic about using decision aids as a source of high quality information that could improve patient experience and confidence in treatment. However, providers had concerns about decision aid accessibility, time constraints to conduct shared decision making in-session, and patient motivation to engage in shared decision making. Providers stated they would prefer to use shared decision making with patients that they felt were most likely to follow through with treatment. While providers believed that shared decision making could improve PTSD treatment planning, they thought it most appropriate for patients with the highest levels of motivation and fewest barriers to care. These beliefs may limit widespread adoption and reflect missed opportunities to reach difficult-to-engage patients.
共同决策是提高基于证据的心理健康实践利用率的重要实施“拉动”策略。在这项定性研究中,我们使用一种公开的、面向患者的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)决策支持工具,探讨了提供者在心理健康治疗启动时实施共同决策的观点。我们对在五个退伍军人事务部初级保健诊所之一工作的 22 名精神健康提供者(精神科医生、护士、心理学家和社会工作者)进行了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析对访谈进行了分析。提供者对使用决策辅助工具作为高质量信息的来源非常感兴趣,这可以改善患者的体验并增强他们对治疗的信心。然而,提供者对决策辅助工具的可及性、在会话中进行共同决策的时间限制以及患者参与共同决策的动机存在担忧。提供者表示,他们更愿意与他们认为最有可能继续接受治疗的患者一起使用共同决策。虽然提供者认为共同决策可以改善 PTSD 治疗计划,但他们认为最适合那些动机最高、治疗障碍最少的患者。这些信念可能会限制其广泛采用,并反映出错失了接触难以接触的患者的机会。