• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Military culture and collaborative decision-making in mental healthcare: cultural, communication and policy considerations.军事文化与精神卫生保健中的协作决策:文化、沟通与政策考量
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 14;9(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.516.
2
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
Exploring patterns in psychiatric outpatients' preferences for involvement in decision-making: a latent class analysis approach.探讨精神科门诊患者参与决策偏好模式:潜在类别分析方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03137-x.
5
How Shared Is Shared Decision Making? Reaching the Full Potential of Patient-Clinician Collaboration in Mental Health.共同决策的共享程度如何?充分发挥患者与临床医生在心理健康领域合作的潜力。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(5):361-369. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000304.
6
Exploring patient centredness, communication and shared decision-making under a new model of care: Community rehabilitation in canada.探索以新的医疗模式为背景下的以患者为中心、沟通和共同决策:加拿大社区康复。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):1051-1063. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13304. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity.一种在决策能力评估中支持沟通的协作方法。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(11):1107-14. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1092176. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
8
Engaging consumers and health professionals in collaborative decision-making to optimize care.让消费者和医疗专业人员参与共同决策以优化护理。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Mar;24(1):73-77. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12901. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
9
Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country.转移性乳腺癌护理中共同决策实施的障碍和策略:在亚洲国家的患者和医疗保健专业人员中进行的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2837-2850. doi: 10.1111/hex.13590. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
10
Promoting collaborative psychiatric care decision-making in community mental health centers: Insights from a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial.促进社区心理健康中心的协作式精神科护理决策:一项以患者为中心的比较效果试验的见解
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Mar;44(1):11-21. doi: 10.1037/prj0000455. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a stakeholder-engaged, iterative, and systematic approach to adapting collaborative decision skills training for implementation in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers.采用利益相关者参与、迭代和系统的方法,对协作决策技能培训进行改编,以便在退伍军人事务部心理康复和恢复中心实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08833-2.
2
Addressing Disparities in Treatment Engagement Models.解决治疗参与模式中的差异问题。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Aug 1;73(8):841. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.22073008.
3
Representation and Outcomes of Individuals With Schizophrenia Seen in Everyday Practice Who Are Ineligible for Randomized Clinical Trials.日常实践中不符合随机临床试验条件的精神分裂症患者的特征及结局
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;79(3):210-218. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3990.
4
NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的共同决策指南与心理健康:研究、实践与实施面临的挑战
BJPsych Open. 2021 Sep 2;7(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.987.
5
Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry.是时候支持在精神病学中广泛实施共同决策了。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1183-1184. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2247.
6
How Shared Is Shared Decision Making? Reaching the Full Potential of Patient-Clinician Collaboration in Mental Health.共同决策的共享程度如何?充分发挥患者与临床医生在心理健康领域合作的潜力。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(5):361-369. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000304.
7
Veteran help-seeking behaviour for mental health issues: a systematic review.退伍军人心理健康问题的求助行为:一项系统综述。
BMJ Mil Health. 2022 Feb;168(1):99-104. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-001903. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
8
Skills-based intervention to enhance collaborative decision-making: systematic adaptation and open trial protocol for veterans with psychosis.基于技能的干预措施以增强共同决策:针对患有精神病的退伍军人的系统改编及开放试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 29;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00820-4.
9
Provider Perspectives on Implementing Shared Decision Making for PTSD Treatment in VA Primary Care.提供者视角下的 VA 初级保健 PTSD 治疗中实施共享决策。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):1046-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01119-5. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
10
Shared Risk Taking: Shared Decision Making in Serious Mental Illness.共同承担风险:严重精神疾病中的共同决策。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Apr 1;72(4):461-463. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000156. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

军事文化与精神卫生保健中的协作决策:文化、沟通与政策考量

Military culture and collaborative decision-making in mental healthcare: cultural, communication and policy considerations.

作者信息

Treichler Emily B H, Reznik Samantha J, Oakes David, Girard Vanessa, Zisman-Ilani Yaara

机构信息

VA San Diego Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, San Diego, California, USA; and Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

VA San Diego Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Center, San Diego, California, USA; and Texas Institute for Excellence in Mental Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 14;9(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.516.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2023.516
PMID:37578050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10486237/
Abstract

Military culture relies on hierarchy and obedience, which contradict the implementation and use of collaborative care models. In this commentary, a team of lived experience, clinical and research experts discuss, for the first time, cultural, communication and policy considerations for implementing collaborative care models in military mental healthcare settings.

摘要

军事文化依赖于等级制度和服从,这与协作式护理模式的实施和应用相矛盾。在这篇评论文章中,一个由有实际经验者、临床专家和研究专家组成的团队首次讨论了在军事精神卫生保健环境中实施协作式护理模式时在文化、沟通和政策方面需要考虑的因素。