Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
IRCSS Neuromed Mediterranean Neurological Institute, Pozzilli, Italy.
Histol Histopathol. 2021 Aug;36(8):795-806. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-319. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) are applicable not only in the clinical context, but also in the forensic field. Over time, the literature has accumulated scientific evidence supporting the use of specific histopathological tests in dating traumatic brain injuries. In primary damage, cell death occurs by necrosis/apoptosis. In secondary injury, the underlying mechanisms are inflammation and ischemia. The inflammatory response of the central nervous system (CNS) follows the common steps of the innate response. In head injury, the blood brain barrier (BBB) undergoes both functional damage and, subsequently, finer structural changes. Scientific evidence has shown modifications of the junctional-endothelial system that favors the extravasation of immunocompetent cells. The histological evaluation of the subdural hematoma, of the cerebral contusions, of the diffuse axonal damage can certainly bring useful elements, with limitations, to the chronological evaluation of the lesions. Many markers have been used to better define the dating of the head injury. Several authors also analyzed the usefulness of secondary damage markers in brain tissue. The progress achieved with immunohistochemistry is significant compared to the use of routine staining. With immunohistochemistry it is possible to identify much narrower and more precise time intervals and, above all, with greater probative reliability. Recently attention has been paid to the modification of structural proteins and miRNAs. Future research is already started and entrusted to multidisciplinary teams that know how to combine their specific skills in search of a reproducible standard of known and sufficient accuracy.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的研究不仅适用于临床环境,也适用于法医领域。随着时间的推移,文献积累了支持在创伤性脑损伤的时间推断中使用特定组织病理学测试的科学证据。在原发性损伤中,细胞通过坏死/凋亡而死亡。在继发性损伤中,潜在机制是炎症和缺血。中枢神经系统(CNS)的炎症反应遵循固有反应的常见步骤。在头部损伤中,血脑屏障(BBB)不仅经历功能损伤,随后还会发生更精细的结构变化。科学证据表明,连接内皮系统发生改变,有利于免疫活性细胞的渗出。对硬膜下血肿、脑挫裂伤、弥漫性轴索损伤的组织学评估肯定可以为损伤的时间推断带来有用的元素,但也存在局限性。许多标志物已被用于更好地定义头部损伤的时间推断。一些作者还分析了脑组织中继发性损伤标志物的有用性。与常规染色相比,免疫组织化学取得了显著进展。通过免疫组织化学,可以识别更窄和更精确的时间间隔,尤其是具有更高的证明可靠性。最近,人们关注结构蛋白和 miRNA 的改变。未来的研究已经开始,并委托给多学科团队,这些团队知道如何结合他们的特定技能来寻找已知和足够准确的可重复标准。
J Neuroinflammation. 2019-11-11
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024
Genes (Basel). 2024-5-13
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024-1-30
Radiol Med. 2023-1
Int J Mol Sci. 2022-8-15
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022-7-6
Brain Res Bull. 2019-9-17
Neuropharmacology. 2018-7-31
J Neurosurg Sci. 2018-10