Fontova Pere, Colom Helena, Rigo-Bonnin Raül, Bestard Oriol, Vidal-Alabró Anna, van Merendonk Lisanne N, Cerezo Gema, Polo Carolina, Montero Nuria, Melilli Edoardo, Manonelles Anna, Meneghini Maria, Coloma Ana, Cruzado Josep M, Torras Joan, Grinyó Josep M, Lloberas Nuria
Nephrology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Nephrology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul;110(1):238-247. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2220. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
Tacrolimus (Tac) is the cornerstone calcineurin inhibitor in transplantation. Extended-release Meltdose formulation (Tac-LCP) offers better bioavailability compared with immediate-release formulation (Tac-IR). We postulated that the less fluctuating pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Tac-LCP might maintain a sustained inhibition of calcineurin activity (CNA) between dose intervals. Higher concentrations (peak plasma concentration (C )) after Tac-IR may not result in a more potent CNA inhibition due to a capacity-limited effect. This study was aimed at evaluating the pharmacodynamic (PD)/PK profiles of Tac-IR compared with Tac-LCP. An open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, investigator-driven study was conducted. Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients receiving Tac-IR were switched to Tac-LCP. Before and 28 days after conversion, intensive CNA-PD and PK sampling were conducted using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem accurate mass spectrometry. PD nonlinear mixed effects model was performed in Phoenix-WinNonlin. Statistically significant higher C (P < 0.001) after Tac-IR did not result in lower CNA as compared with after Tac-LCP (P = 0.860). Tac-LCP showed a statistically more maintained CNA inhibition between dose intervals (area under the effect-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUE )) compared with Tac-IR, in which CNA returned to predose levels after 4 hours of drug intake (373.8 vs. 290.5 pmol RII·h/min·mg prot, Tac-LCP vs. Tac-IR; P = 0.039). No correlation was achieved between any PD and PK parameters in any formulations. Moreover, Tac concentration to elicit a 50% of the maximum response (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was 9.24 ng/mL. The higher C after Tac-IR does not result in an additional CNA inhibition compared with Tac-LCP attributable to a capacity-limited effect. Tac-LCP may represent an improvement of the PD of Tac due to the more sustained CNA inhibition during dose intervals.
他克莫司(Tac)是移植领域中钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的基石。与速释制剂(Tac-IR)相比,缓释型Meltdose制剂(Tac-LCP)具有更好的生物利用度。我们推测,Tac-LCP波动较小的药代动力学(PK)特征可能在给药间隔期间维持对钙调神经磷酸酶活性(CNA)的持续抑制。由于容量限制效应,Tac-IR后较高的浓度(血浆峰浓度(C))可能不会导致更强的CNA抑制作用。本研究旨在评估Tac-IR与Tac-LCP相比的药效学(PD)/PK特征。开展了一项开放标签、前瞻性、非随机、研究者主导的研究。25名接受Tac-IR的肾移植受者改用Tac-LCP。在转换前和转换后28天,使用超高效液相色谱-串联精确质谱法进行密集的CNA-PD和PK采样。在Phoenix-WinNonlin中进行PD非线性混合效应模型分析。与Tac-LCP后相比,Tac-IR后具有统计学意义的更高C(P < 0.001)并未导致更低的CNA(P = 0.860)。与Tac-IR相比,Tac-LCP在给药间隔期间显示出统计学上更持续的CNA抑制作用(0至24小时效应-时间曲线下面积(AUE)),其中Tac-IR在服药4小时后CNA恢复到给药前水平(373.8对290.5 pmol RII·h/min·mg蛋白,Tac-LCP对Tac-IR;P = 0.039)。任何制剂的任何PD和PK参数之间均未发现相关性。此外,引起最大反应50%(半数最大抑制浓度)的他克莫司浓度为9.24 ng/mL。与Tac-LCP相比,Tac-IR后更高的C并未导致额外的CNA抑制,这归因于容量限制效应。由于在给药间隔期间CNA抑制作用更持久,Tac-LCP可能代表了他克莫司在药效学方面的一种改进。