Suppr超能文献

MeltDose技术与每日一次长效释放他克莫司用于初发肝移植受者的比较

MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients.

作者信息

Baccarani Umberto, Velkoski Jaqueline, Pravisani Riccardo, Adani Gian Luigi, Lorenzin Dario, Cherchi Vittorio, Falzone Bruno, Baraldo Massimo, Risaliti Andrea

机构信息

Clinica Chirurgica, Centro Trapianti di Fegato-Rene - Dipartimento di Area Medica. Università di Udine, Udine, Italy.

Clinica Chirurgica, Centro Trapianti di Fegato-Rene - Dipartimento di Area Medica. Università di Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2019 Nov;51(9):2971-2973. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.084. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An extended-release formulation of tacrolimus designed for once-daily administration (LCP-TAC) is a new prolonged-release tacrolimus (TAC-PR) formulation using a drug delivery technology designed to enhance the bioavailability of drugs compared with TAC-PR. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare de novo administration of LCP-TAC and TAC-PR for therapeutic trough levels and daily dosage during the first 30 days after first liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

A total of 35 patients submitted to first LT between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled: 16 received LCP-TAC, while 19 received TAC-PR as de novo immunosuppression. Patients were analyzed for daily dosage and trough levels at postoperative days (PODs) 3, 7, 15, and 30.

RESULTS

The initial dose of tacrolimus did not differ between LCP-TAC and TAC-PR (mean, 5.19 [SD, 1.72] mg/d vs mean, 5.26 [SD, 1.91] mg/d, P = .90). On PODs 7, 15, and 30 the daily dosage was statistically lower for LCP-TAC compared with TAC-PR (mean, 5.44 [SD, 2.06] mg/d vs mean, 7.68 [SD, 2.91] mg/d, P = .01; mean, 5.33 [SD, 2.23] mg/d vs mean, 8.82 [SD, 2.35] mg/d, P < .001; and mean, 5.38 [SD, 2.50] mg/d vs mean, 9.81 [SD, 3.78] mg/d, P < .001, respectively). The therapeutic trough levels were significantly higher for LCP-TAC on POD 3 (mean, 5.05 [SD, 3.58] ng/mL vs mean, 2.42 [SD, 2.75] ng/mL, P = .03) and POD 5 (mean, 7.35 [SD, 5.12] ng/mL vs mean, 4.17 [SD, 2.05] ng/mL, P = .04), while no differences were found on PODs 7, 15, and 30.The percentage of patients on POD 3 achieving a trough level higher than 6 ng/mL was higher for LCP-TAC than TAC-PR (40% vs 13%, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

LCP-TAC after LT is safe and might enhance bioavailability, reducing the amount of drug necessary to achieve therapeutic trough levels compared with TAC-PR.

摘要

背景

他克莫司缓释制剂设计为每日一次给药(LCP-TAC),是一种新型的延长释放他克莫司(TAC-PR)制剂,采用了一种药物递送技术,旨在与TAC-PR相比提高药物的生物利用度。本研究的目的是回顾性比较首次肝移植(LT)后前30天LCP-TAC和TAC-PR的初始给药的治疗谷浓度和每日剂量。

方法

回顾性纳入2016年至2018年间接受首次LT的35例患者:16例接受LCP-TAC,19例接受TAC-PR作为初始免疫抑制治疗。分析患者术后第3、7、15和30天的每日剂量和谷浓度。

结果

LCP-TAC和TAC-PR的他克莫司初始剂量无差异(均值分别为5.19[标准差,1.72]mg/d和5.26[标准差,1.91]mg/d,P = 0.90)。在术后第7、15和30天,LCP-TAC的每日剂量在统计学上低于TAC-PR(均值分别为5.44[标准差,2.06]mg/d和7.68[标准差,2.91]mg/d,P = 0.01;均值分别为5.33[标准差,2.23]mg/d和8.82[标准差,2.35]mg/d,P < 0.001;均值分别为5.38[标准差,2.50]mg/d和9.81[标准差,3.78]mg/d,P < 0.001)。LCP-TAC在术后第3天(均值分别为5.05[标准差,3.58]ng/mL和2.42[标准差,2.75]ng/mL,P = 0.03)和第5天(均值分别为7.35[标准差,5.12]ng/mL和4.17[标准差,2.05]ng/mL,P = 0.04)的治疗谷浓度显著高于TAC-PR,而在术后第7、15和30天未发现差异。LCP-TAC术后第3天谷浓度高于6 ng/mL的患者百分比高于TAC-PR(40%对13%,P = 0.05)。

结论

LT后使用LCP-TAC是安全的,可能会提高生物利用度,与TAC-PR相比,达到治疗谷浓度所需的药物量减少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验