San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 May;54(5):745-754. doi: 10.1002/eat.23488. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
The present study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a large sample of cisgender sexual minority men and women, and subsequently, to evaluate measurement invariance by gender.
The sample consisted of 962 sexual minority adult men (n = 479) and women (n = 483) who completed online self-report surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using two previously supported factor structures (Friborg et al.'s four-factor model and Grilo et al.'s brief three-factor model) as well as the original four-factor structure of the EDE-Q.
Results indicated that the best fitting models were Friborg et al.'s four-factor model (CFI = .974, RMSEA = .098, SRMR = .0 70) and Grilo et al.'s brief three-factor model (CFI = .999, RMSEA = .049, SRMR = .017). The model fit of both factor structures were nearly identical when examined separately for men and women. The original four-factor structure could not be supported in this sample. Measurement invariance analyses further indicated that the best fitting models were invariant by gender in sexual minority individuals. Internal consistency was adequate for all subscales of Friborg et al.'s and Grilo et al.'s models.
The present study provides support for the use of the EDE-Q in sexual minority men and women. Additionally, findings demonstrate that the EDE-Q performs similarly in sexual minority men and women. Future research is needed to further evaluate measurement invariance of the EDE-Q by sexual orientation, gender identity, and race.
本研究旨在调查跨性别性少数群体男性和女性大样本中饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)的因素结构,随后评估性别测量不变性。
该样本由 962 名跨性别成年男性(n = 479)和女性(n = 483)组成,他们完成了在线自我报告调查。使用先前支持的两种因素结构(Friborg 等人的四因素模型和 Grilo 等人的简短三因素模型)以及 EDE-Q 的原始四因素结构进行验证性因子分析。
结果表明,拟合度最好的模型是 Friborg 等人的四因素模型(CFI =.974,RMSEA =.098,SRMR =.070)和 Grilo 等人的简短三因素模型(CFI =.999,RMSEA =.049,SRMR =.017)。当分别检查男性和女性时,这两种因素结构的模型拟合几乎相同。原始的四因素结构在这个样本中无法得到支持。测量不变性分析进一步表明,最佳拟合模型在跨性别个体中具有性别不变性。Friborg 等人和 Grilo 等人模型的所有分量的内部一致性都足够好。
本研究为在跨性别男性和女性中使用 EDE-Q 提供了支持。此外,研究结果表明,EDE-Q 在跨性别男性和女性中的表现相似。未来的研究需要进一步评估 EDE-Q 在性取向、性别认同和种族方面的测量不变性。