Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;37(1):81-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722910. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Classic Joseph hump reduction techniques have been a hallmark of current rhinoplasty practice and teaching. Recently, there has been a renewed global interest in preservation rhinoplasty techniques, although these techniques are not new. The work and techniques of innovative surgeons including Goodale, Lothrop, and Cottle describing preservation concepts from the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century were not as prevalently adopted as open structural approaches. As such, there has been a relative paucity in both research and teaching of preservation techniques-particularly in the United States. A survey of members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society (145 respondents) demonstrates that while 15 (10%) of surgeons are not at all familiar with dorsal preservation surgery, 130 (90%) were. In the group that was familiar with dorsal preservation, the majority were only somewhat familiar (84, 65%) with these techniques. Only 11 respondents received any formal training in dorsal preservation techniques during residency or fellowship. 61 (42%) had attended a course or conference in which dorsal preservation techniques were discussed. One-hundred twenty-two survey respondents (84.1%) do not currently implement preservation techniques into their rhinoplasty practice. Twelve (8%) respondents implement it in <25% of cases, 5 (3%) in 25 to 50% of cases, and 6 (4%) in >50% of cases. As research and formal training in preservation rhinoplasty grow, familiarity and implementation of these techniques will likely also grow in the United States.
经典的约瑟夫驼峰减少技术一直是当前鼻整形术实践和教学的标志。最近,全球对保留鼻整形技术重新产生了兴趣,尽管这些技术并不是新的。包括古德尔、洛思罗普和科特尔在内的创新外科医生的工作和技术,从 19 世纪末和 20 世纪初就描述了保留概念,但并没有像开放式结构方法那样普遍采用。因此,保留技术的研究和教学相对较少——特别是在美国。对美国面部整形和重建外科学会和鼻整形学会成员(145 名受访者)的调查表明,虽然 15 名(10%)外科医生对鼻背保护手术完全不熟悉,但 130 名(90%)外科医生对其有所了解。在熟悉鼻背保护的人群中,大多数人只是有些熟悉(84,65%)这些技术。只有 11 名受访者在住院医师或研究员期间接受过任何关于鼻背保护技术的正规培训。61 名(42%)参加过讨论鼻背保护技术的课程或会议。122 名调查受访者(84.1%)目前没有将保留技术应用于他们的鼻整形手术中。12 名(8%)受访者在<25%的病例中实施,5 名(3%)在 25%至 50%的病例中实施,6 名(4%)在>50%的病例中实施。随着对保留鼻整形术的研究和正规培训的增加,这些技术在美国的熟悉程度和应用也可能会增加。