Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017002. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is reported to be a safe treatment tool for aneurysms. However, mortality occurs in a few cases, and this has not been clearly studied. We conducted a multicenter study to retrospectively evaluate the causes of, and risk factors for, mortality in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED.
We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively maintained databases of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by PED placement at 14 academic institutions from 2014 to 2019. Patients' data, including clinical and radiographic information, were analyzed with an emphasis on mortality-related complications.
A total of 1171 consecutive patients underwent 1319 PED procedures to treat 1322 intracranial aneurysms. The mortality rate was 1.5% (17/1171), and in 1.3% of the patients (15/1171), deaths were caused by delayed aneurysmal rupture, distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and neurological compression symptoms associated with PED procedures. Multivariate analysis showed that previous treatment (OR, 12.657; 95% CI, 3.189 to 50.227; P<0.0001), aneurysm size ≥10 mm (OR, 4.704; 95% CI, 1.297 to 17.068; P=0.019), aneurysm location (basilar artery) (OR, 10.734; 95% CI, 2.730 to 42.207; P=0.001), and current subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR, 4.505; 95% CI, 0.991 to 20.474; P=0.051) were associated with neurological complications resulting in mortality.
Delayed aneurysm rupture, distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and neurological compression were the main causes of mortality in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED. Large basilar aneurysms are associated with an increased risk of postoperative death and require increased attention and caution.
Pipeline 栓塞装置(PED)已被报道为一种治疗动脉瘤的安全治疗工具。然而,仍有少数情况下会发生死亡,这一点尚未得到明确研究。我们进行了一项多中心研究,回顾性评估了 2014 年至 2019 年期间,14 家学术机构的 1171 例颅内动脉瘤患者接受 PED 治疗后死亡的原因和危险因素。
我们回顾性分析了 2014 年至 2019 年期间,14 家学术机构的 1171 例接受 PED 治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者的前瞻性数据库。对患者的临床和影像学信息进行分析,重点关注与死亡率相关的并发症。
共 1171 例连续患者接受了 1319 次 PED 手术,以治疗 1322 个颅内动脉瘤。死亡率为 1.5%(17/1171),在 1.3%的患者(15/1171)中,死亡是由于动脉瘤延迟破裂、远隔脑实质内出血以及与 PED 手术相关的神经压迫症状引起的。多变量分析显示,既往治疗(OR,12.657;95%CI,3.189 至 50.227;P<0.0001)、动脉瘤大小≥10mm(OR,4.704;95%CI,1.297 至 17.068;P=0.019)、动脉瘤位置(基底动脉)(OR,10.734;95%CI,2.730 至 42.207;P=0.001)和当前蛛网膜下腔出血(OR,4.505;95%CI,0.991 至 20.474;P=0.051)与导致死亡的神经并发症相关。
颅内动脉瘤患者接受 PED 治疗后,迟发性动脉瘤破裂、远隔脑实质内出血和神经压迫是导致死亡的主要原因。大型基底动脉瘤与术后死亡风险增加相关,需要引起更多关注和警惕。