Suppr超能文献

预测院外心脏骤停患者预后的反应时间阈值

Response Time Threshold for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

作者信息

Huang Ling Hsuan, Ho Yu-Ni, Tsai Ming-Ta, Wu Wei-Ting, Cheng Fu-Jen

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2021 Feb 11;2021:5564885. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564885. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Ambulance response time is a prognostic factor for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the impact of ambulance response time under different situations remains unclear. We evaluated the threshold of ambulance response time for predicting survival to hospital discharge for patients with OHCA. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using the emergency medical service (EMS) database (January 2015 to December 2019). Prehospital factors, underlying diseases, and OHCA outcomes were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with Youden Index was performed to calculate optimal cut-off values for ambulance response time that predicted survival to hospital discharge. In all, 6742 cases of adult OHCA were analyzed. After adjustment for confounding factors, age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.983, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.975-0.992, < 0.001), witness (OR = 3.022, 95% CI: 2.014-4.534, < 0.001), public location (OR = 2.797, 95% CI: 2.062-3.793, < 0.001), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, OR = 1.363, 95% CI: 1.009-1.841, =0.044), EMT-paramedic response (EMT-P, OR = 1.713, 95% CI: 1.282-2.290, < 0.001), and prehospital defibrillation using an automated external defibrillator ([AED] OR = 3.984, 95% CI: 2.920-5.435, < 0.001) were statistically and significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge. The cut-off value was 6.2 min. If the location of OHCA was a public place or bystander CPR was provided, the threshold was prolonged to 7.2 min and 6.3 min, respectively. In the absence of a witness, EMT-P, or AED, the threshold was reduced to 4.2, 5, and 5 min, respectively. The adjusted OR of EMS response time for survival to hospital discharge was 1.217 (per minute shorter, CI: 1.140-1299, < 0.001) and 1.992 (<6.2 min, 95% CI: 1.496-2.653, < 0.001). The optimal response time threshold for survival to hospital discharge was 6.2 min. In the case of OHCA in public areas or with bystander CPR, the threshold was prolonged, and without witness, the optimal response time threshold was shortened.

摘要

救护车响应时间是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的一个预后因素,但不同情况下救护车响应时间的影响仍不明确。我们评估了OHCA患者预测存活至出院的救护车响应时间阈值。使用紧急医疗服务(EMS)数据库(2015年1月至2019年12月)进行了一项回顾性观察分析。评估了院前因素、基础疾病和OHCA结局。采用Youden指数进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以计算预测存活至出院的救护车响应时间的最佳截断值。总共分析了6742例成人OHCA病例。在对混杂因素进行调整后,年龄(优势比[OR]=0.983,95%置信区间[CI]:0.975-0.992,P<0.001)、目击者(OR=3.022,95%CI:2.014-4.534,P<0.001)、公共场所(OR=2.797,95%CI:2.062-3.793,P<0.001)、旁观者心肺复苏(CPR,OR=1.363,95%CI:1.009-1.841,P=0.044)、急救医疗技术员-护理人员响应(EMT-P,OR=1.713,95%CI:1.282-2.290,P<0.0

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验