Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Department of Statistics, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 Mar;27(2):231-237. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.22487.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament tears using either ToggleLoc with ZipLoop or Transfix systems.
This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ToggleLoc with ZipLoop and Transfix systems in our clinic between 2011 and 2016. This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patient's demographic, clinical and financial data. The effectiveness of surgery on patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was determined by the Lysholm Knee Score Scale. We compared two systems with the cost-effectiveness ratio.
In this study, 103 patients were included. According to the Lysholm Knee Score Scales in both groups, the findings showed that there was no difference in effectiveness between them. The ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technique was cost-effectiveness ratio 254,57 and the Transfix technique cost-effectiveness ratio was 378,33.
According to our results, ToggleLoc with ZipLoop technique was a more cost-effective method than the Transfix technique in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
评估使用 ToggleLoc 带 ZipLoop 或 Transfix 系统重建前交叉韧带撕裂的成本效益。
本研究是对 2011 年至 2016 年间在我们诊所接受前交叉韧带重建的患者使用 ToggleLoc 带 ZipLoop 和 Transfix 系统的成本效益分析。这是一项回顾性的横截面研究，涉及患者的人口统计学、临床和财务数据。手术对前交叉韧带重建患者的有效性通过 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表来确定。我们比较了两种系统的成本效益比。
本研究共纳入 103 例患者。根据两组的 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表，结果显示两组在疗效方面无差异。ToggleLoc 带 ZipLoop 技术的成本效益比为 254.57，而 Transfix 技术的成本效益比为 378.33。
根据我们的结果，在前交叉韧带重建中，ToggleLoc 带 ZipLoop 技术比 Transfix 技术更具成本效益。
