Suppr超能文献

AppendistatTM 评分的外部验证及与 CRP 水平比较对预测复杂性阑尾炎的价值。

External validation of the AppendistatTM score and comparison with CRP levels for the prediction of complicated appendicitis.

机构信息

Department of Genaral Surgery, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 Mar;27(2):187-191. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.68246.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In acute appendicitis, the treatment approach may vary depending on the age and comorbidities of the patient and whether the appendix is complicated. In this study, we validated the appendistatTM score, including the logistic regression model of complicated appendicitis, and compared the efficacy of this scoring with C-reactive protein in predicting complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

Demographic characteristics, pathology, and laboratory results of patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis were retrospectively screened, those over 18 years of age were included in the study. The appendistatTM scores, including the logistic regression model of complicated appendicitis, were obtained.

RESULTS

Complicated appendicitis was present in 13 (10.1%) patients and non-complicated appendicitis in 116 (89.9%). Two (15.4%) of the complicated appendicitis cases were female and 11 (84.6%) were male. The mean age of complicated appendicitis cases was 44 (20-77) years, and their median value of C-reactive protein was 41.00 mg/L. In the ROC curve analysis, the cut-off value for C-reactive protein was 23.5 mg/L and that of the appendistatTM as 9.6. The area under the curve values of the appendistatTM score and C-reactive protein were 0.787 and 0.750, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AppendistatTM is a successful scoring system that contains appropriate parameters. However, C-reactive protein detecting or excluding complicated appendicitis at a similar rate to AppendistatTM suggests that the latter does not have a significant advantage in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

在急性阑尾炎中,治疗方法可能因患者的年龄和合并症以及阑尾是否复杂而有所不同。在这项研究中,我们验证了 appendistatTM 评分,包括复杂阑尾炎的逻辑回归模型,并比较了该评分与 C 反应蛋白预测复杂阑尾炎的疗效。

方法

回顾性筛选行阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的患者的人口统计学特征、病理和实验室结果,纳入年龄超过 18 岁的患者。获得 appendistatTM 评分,包括复杂阑尾炎的逻辑回归模型。

结果

复杂阑尾炎患者 13 例(10.1%),非复杂阑尾炎患者 116 例(89.9%)。复杂阑尾炎患者中,女性 2 例(15.4%),男性 11 例(84.6%)。复杂阑尾炎患者的平均年龄为 44 岁(20-77 岁),C 反应蛋白中位数为 41.00mg/L。在 ROC 曲线分析中,C 反应蛋白的截断值为 23.5mg/L,appendistatTM 的截断值为 9.6。appendistatTM 评分和 C 反应蛋白的曲线下面积值分别为 0.787 和 0.750。

结论

appendistatTM 是一个成功的评分系统,包含适当的参数。然而,C 反应蛋白检测或排除复杂阑尾炎的效果与 AppendistatTM 相似,提示后者在临床实践中没有显著优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验