Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Apr;28(2):364-378. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0381. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Injury to the facial nerve can occur after different etiologies and range from simple transection of the branches to varying degrees of segmental loss. Management depends on the extent of injury and options include primary repair for simple transections and using autografts, allografts, or conduits for larger gaps. Tissue engineering plays an important role to create artificial materials that are able to mimic the nerve itself without extra morbidity in the patients. The use of neurotrophic factors or stem cells inside the conduits or around the repair site is being increasingly studied to enhance neural recovery to a greater extent. Preclinical studies remain the hallmark for development of these novel approaches and translation into clinical practice. This review will focus on preclinical models of repair after facial nerve injury to help researchers establish an appropriate model to quantify recovery and analyze functional outcomes. Different bioengineered materials, including conduits and nerve grafts, will be discussed based on the experimental animals that were used and the defects introduced. Future directions to extend the applications of processed nerve allografts, bioengineered conduits, and cues inside the conduits to induce neural recovery after facial nerve injury will be highlighted. Impact statement Recovery after facial nerve injury is a complex process, which involves different management options such as primary repair or the use of nerve grafts or conduits. Various tissue-engineered approaches are increasingly studied on preclinical models with limited, but promising, translation to the clinical setting. Herein, preclinical models focusing on different recovery methods after facial nerve injury are comprehensively reviewed based on the experimental animals used. The review provides key insights into current developments and future directions on this highly relevant topic to help researchers further expand the field of tissue engineering and facial nerve recovery.
面神经损伤可由不同病因引起,范围从分支的简单横断到不同程度的节段性丧失。其治疗方法取决于损伤的程度,包括简单横断的一期修复以及使用自体移植物、同种异体移植物或导管修复较大的间隙。组织工程在创建能够模拟神经本身的人工材料方面发挥着重要作用,而不会给患者带来额外的发病率。在导管内或修复部位周围使用神经营养因子或干细胞来增强神经恢复的程度,这一方法正越来越受到关注。临床前研究仍然是开发这些新方法并将其转化为临床实践的标志。本文综述了面神经损伤后修复的临床前模型,以帮助研究人员建立适当的模型来量化恢复情况并分析功能结果。将根据所使用的实验动物和引入的缺陷,讨论不同的生物工程材料,包括导管和神经移植物。本文还将重点介绍在面神经损伤后应用加工的同种异体神经移植物、生物工程导管以及导管内的线索来促进神经恢复的未来方向。
影响陈述面神经损伤后的恢复是一个复杂的过程,涉及不同的治疗选择,如一期修复或使用神经移植物或导管。各种组织工程方法正在临床前模型中进行越来越多的研究,尽管转化为临床环境的研究有限,但前景广阔。本文综述了基于所使用的实验动物的面神经损伤后不同恢复方法的临床前模型,全面回顾了这一高度相关的研究领域的当前进展和未来方向,以帮助研究人员进一步拓展组织工程和面神经恢复领域。