Suppr超能文献

中国的恐怖主义和十年来伤亡事件引发的反恐医学新需求。

Terrorism in China and the Emerging Needs for Counter- Terrorism Medicine Following a Decade of Deaths and Injuries.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) Disaster Medicine Fellowship; Department of Emergency Medicine, BIDMC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MassachusettsUSA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Jun;36(3):270-275. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000170. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

China is ranked 42nd on the Global Terrorism Index (2019), a scoring system of terrorist activities. While China has a relatively low terrorism risk, events globally have wide-ranging repercussions for future attacks, putting first responders and emergency health workers at risk. This study aims to provide the epidemiological context for the past decade detailing the unique injury types responders are likely to encounter and to develop training programs utilizing these data.

METHODS

The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) was searched for all attacks in China between the years 2008-2018. Attacks met inclusion criteria if they fulfilled the terrorism-related criteria as set by the GTD's Codebook. Ambiguous events, as defined by the GTD's Codebook, were excluded. English language grey literature was searched to ensure no events meeting these criteria were missed. A focused search of online English language newspaper articles was also performed for any terrorist events between 2008-2018.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eight terrorist events occurred in the study time period. Of the 108 incidents, forty-seven (43.5%) involved Explosives/Bombs/Dynamite (E/B/D) only, with an average fatality count of 2.9 and injury count of 7.5 per event. Twenty-seven (25.0%) used bladed or blunt weapons in melees with an average fatality count of 9.7 and an injury count of 8.8 per event. Five (4.6%) involved incendiary weapons with an average fatality count of 2.4 and an injury count of 7.2 per event. Two used only chemical weapons (1.8%) with no recorded deaths and an injury count of 27.0 per event. Two events had unknown weapon types (1.8%) with one recorded death and no injury count. One event used a firearm (0.9%) and led to one death and no injuries. One event used a vehicle (0.9%), which also led to one death and no recorded injuries. Twenty-three attacks used a mix of weapons (21.2%) with an average fatality count of 17.1 and an injury count of 12.0 per event.

CONCLUSIONS

One-hundred and eight terrorist attacks were recorded between 2008-2018 on Chinese soil using well-understood modalities. This resulted in a total of 809 recorded fatalities with 956 non-fatal injuries. The most commonly chosen methodology was E/B/D, followed by melees and the use of bladed weapons. Three events individually recorded a combined casualty toll of over 100 people.

摘要

背景

中国在全球恐怖主义指数(2019 年)中排名第 42 位,该指数是对恐怖活动的评分系统。尽管中国的恐怖主义风险相对较低,但全球事件对未来的袭击产生了广泛的影响,使急救人员和紧急卫生工作者面临风险。本研究旨在为过去十年提供流行病学背景,详细说明急救人员可能遇到的独特伤害类型,并利用这些数据制定培训计划。

方法

在全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)中搜索了 2008 年至 2018 年期间在中国发生的所有袭击事件。如果袭击事件符合 GTD 编码手册中规定的与恐怖主义相关的标准,则符合纳入标准。根据 GTD 编码手册的定义,排除了含糊不清的事件。还搜索了英文灰色文献,以确保不会错过符合这些标准的任何事件。还对 2008 年至 2018 年期间的英文在线报纸文章进行了有针对性的搜索,以查找任何恐怖事件。

结果

在研究期间发生了 108 起恐怖事件。在 108 起事件中,有 47 起(43.5%)仅涉及爆炸物/炸弹/炸药(E/B/D),平均每起事件的死亡人数为 2.9 人,受伤人数为 7.5 人。27 起(25.0%)在混战中使用了刀或钝器,平均每起事件的死亡人数为 9.7 人,受伤人数为 8.8 人。5 起(4.6%)涉及纵火武器,平均每起事件的死亡人数为 2.4 人,受伤人数为 7.2 人。2 起事件(1.8%)仅使用化学武器,无死亡记录,受伤人数为 27.0 人。2 起事件的武器类型未知(1.8%),其中 1 人死亡,无受伤人数。1 起事件使用枪支(0.9%),导致 1 人死亡,无人受伤。1 起事件使用车辆(0.9%),导致 1 人死亡,无人受伤。23 起事件(21.2%)使用了混合武器,平均每起事件的死亡人数为 17.1 人,受伤人数为 12.0 人。

结论

2008 年至 2018 年间,在中国境内共记录了 108 起恐怖袭击事件,采用了人们熟知的模式。这导致共有 809 人死亡,956 人受伤。最常选择的方法是 E/B/D,其次是混战和使用刀类武器。有 3 起事件单独造成的伤亡人数超过 100 人。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验