• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化学剂在恐怖事件中的使用:需要增强民用准备的迫在眉睫的风暴。

Chemical Agent Use in Terrorist Events: A Gathering Storm Requiring Enhanced Civilian Preparedness.

机构信息

Senior Fellow, BIDMC Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Director, BIDMC Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jun;37(3):327-332. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000528. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1017/S1049023X22000528
PMID:35392992
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of chemical weapons in terrorist attacks, though rare, remains a significant challenge and concern due to their ability to inflict mass casualties. Chemical attacks remain a topic of interest for Disaster Medicine (DM) and Counter-Terrorism Medicine (CTM) specialists and are clearly an area in need of enhanced preparedness. This study aims to provide an epidemiological description of all terrorism-related attacks using chemical agents as a primary weapon, sustained from 1970 - 2019. These data will be useful in the development of education programs in CTM and provide an insight into how best to prepare for potential attacks in the future.

METHODS

Data collection was performed using a retrospective database search through the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). The GTD was searched using the internal database search functions for all events using chemical weapons as a primary attack method from January 1, 1970 - December 31, 2019. Years 2020 and 2021 were not yet available at the time of the study. The GTD also details the specific chemical used, when known, in the summary of incidents. Results were exported into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp.; Redmond, Washington USA) for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 292 terrorist attacks involving chemical agents as a primary attack method were recorded from 1970 - 2019, registering 284 deaths and 13,267 injuries. Acid (52) was the most commonly used chemical agent, followed by "unspecified poison" (43), "unknown chemical agents" (29), "unspecified gas" (27), tear gas (27), chlorine gas (24), cyanide (21), mercury (9), pepper spray or mace (9), mustard gas (8), insecticide or 1080 (8), diphenylamine chloroarsine (7), phosphate or phosphorous (3), sodium hydroxide or corrosive liquid (3), sarin (2), "unspecified drugs" (2), VX nerve gas and other nerve gas (2), pesticides (2), cleaning chemicals/paint thinner (2), ammonia (2), anesthesia agent (1), arsenic (1), chlorine and mustard gas mix (1), phenarsazine chloride (1), rat poison (1), unknown irritative gas (1), hydrochloric acid and sodium cyanide mix (1), unknown white powder (1), antiseptic dye (1), and chlorine gas and white phosphorous mix (1).

CONCLUSION

The use of chemical weapons in warfare, though prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), remains a rare but concerning terrorist attack methodology. In recent years, there have been more instances where potentially deadly chemicals have been used in civilian settings. Dual use industrial chemicals, in particular, pose a significant concern. Acid was the most commonly used chemical weapon in 52 attacks. Tear gas, chlorine, and cyanide were each used in over 20 attacks. Both DM and CTM specialists advocate for better preparedness and response training for intentional events in civilian settings.

摘要

背景

尽管恐怖袭击中使用化学武器的情况很少见,但由于其造成大规模伤亡的能力,这仍然是一个重大挑战和关注点。化学袭击仍然是灾难医学(DM)和反恐医学(CTM)专家关注的话题,显然是一个需要加强准备的领域。本研究旨在提供 1970 年至 2019 年间所有以化学制剂为主要武器的恐怖袭击相关事件的流行病学描述。这些数据将有助于 CTM 教育项目的开发,并深入了解如何最好地为未来的潜在袭击做好准备。

方法

通过全球恐怖主义数据库(GTD)进行回顾性数据库检索来进行数据收集。使用 GTD 的内部数据库搜索功能,搜索了 1970 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间所有使用化学武器作为主要攻击手段的事件。在研究时,2020 年和 2021 年的数据尚未可用。GTD 还详细说明了在事件摘要中已知的特定化学制剂。结果被导出到 Excel 电子表格(美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德的微软公司)中进行分析。

结果

1970 年至 2019 年期间共记录了 292 起涉及化学制剂作为主要攻击手段的恐怖袭击事件,造成 284 人死亡,13267 人受伤。酸(52 起)是最常用的化学制剂,其次是“未指定毒药”(43 起)、“不明化学制剂”(29 起)、“未指定气体”(27 起)、催泪瓦斯(27 起)、氯气(24 起)、氰化物(21 起)、汞(9 起)、胡椒喷雾或防暴喷雾(9 起)、芥子气(8 起)、杀虫剂或 1080(8 起)、二苯氨基氯胂(7 起)、磷酸盐或磷(3 起)、氢氧化钠或腐蚀性液体(3 起)、沙林(2 起)、“未指定药物”(2 起)、VX 神经毒气和其他神经毒气(2 起)、杀虫剂(2 起)、清洁化学品/油漆稀释剂(2 起)、氨(2 起)、麻醉剂(1 起)、砷(1 起)、氯气和芥子气混合物(1 起)、苯偶氮苯胂氯(1 起)、老鼠药(1 起)、不明刺激性气体(1 起)、盐酸和氰化钠混合物(1 起)、不明白色粉末(1 起)、防腐剂染料(1 起)、氯气和白磷混合物(1 起)。

结论

尽管《化学武器公约》(CWC)禁止在战争中使用化学武器,但化学武器作为一种罕见但令人关切的恐怖袭击手段仍然存在。近年来,在民用环境中使用潜在致命化学品的情况有所增加。特别是两用工业化学品构成了重大关切。在 52 起袭击中使用了酸。催泪瓦斯、氯气和氰化物都在 20 多起袭击中使用过。DM 和 CTM 专家都主张加强对民用环境中蓄意事件的准备和应对培训。

相似文献

1
Chemical Agent Use in Terrorist Events: A Gathering Storm Requiring Enhanced Civilian Preparedness.化学剂在恐怖事件中的使用:需要增强民用准备的迫在眉睫的风暴。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jun;37(3):327-332. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000528. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Terrorist Attacks in Western Europe: A Counter-Terrorism Medicine Analysis.西欧的恐怖袭击:反恐医学分析
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Feb;37(1):19-24. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001370. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Terrorism-Related Chemical, Biological, Radiation, and Nuclear Attacks: A Historical Global Comparison Influencing the Emergence of Counter-Terrorism Medicine.恐怖主义相关的化学、生物、辐射和核袭击:影响反恐医学出现的历史全球比较。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Aug;36(4):399-402. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000625. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Five Decades of Global Chemical Terror Attacks: Data Analysis to Inform Training and Preparedness.五十年来的全球化学恐怖袭击事件:数据分析对培训和准备工作的启示。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Dec;15(6):750-761. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.176. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
Half-a-Century of Terrorist Attacks: Weapons Selection, Casualty Outcomes, and Implications for Counter-Terrorism Medicine.半个世纪的恐怖袭击:武器选择、伤亡结果以及反恐医学的启示。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Oct;36(5):526-530. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000868. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
A Counter-Terrorism Medicine Analysis of Drone Attacks.无人机袭击的反恐医学分析
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jan 31:1-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000139.
7
Bioterrorism: An analysis of biological agents used in terrorist events.生物恐怖主义:恐怖事件中使用的生物制剂分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;54:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.01.056. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
8
Suicide Bombing Terrorism.自杀式爆炸恐怖主义。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Dec;36(6):664-668. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001151. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
Health Care Implications of Terrorist Attacks in South Asia.南亚恐怖袭击的医疗保健影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jun;37(3):338-342. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000607. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
50 Years of Mass-Fatality Terrorist Attacks: A Retrospective Study of Target Demographics, Modalities, and Injury Patterns to Better Inform Future Counter-Terrorism Medicine Preparedness and Response.50 年大规模伤亡恐怖袭击事件回顾:目标人群特征、方式和伤害模式的研究,以便更好地为未来反恐医学准备和应对提供信息。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Oct;36(5):531-535. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000819. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical, biological and nerve gas attacks: need for education among healthcare personnel and medical students; a Swedish regional cross-sectional web-survey.化学、生物和神经性毒气袭击:医护人员和医学生的教育需求;一项瑞典地区的横断面网络调查
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 5;25(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06488-7.
2
Psychological, cognitive, and physiological impact of hazards casualties' trainings on first responders: the example of a chemical and radiological training. An exploratory study.灾害伤亡培训对急救人员的心理、认知和生理影响:以化学和放射培训为例。一项探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;15:1336701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336701. eCollection 2024.
3
A Descriptive Analysis of the Use of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Weapons by Violent Non-State Actors and the Modern-Day Environment of Threat.
暴力非国家行为者使用化学、生物、放射性和核武器的描述性分析及现代威胁环境。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Jun;38(3):395-400. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23000481. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Evaluation of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosives (CBRNE) Knowledge Change and Skills Confidence Among Frontline-Line Providers During the Russia-Ukraine War.评估前线医护人员在俄乌战争期间化学、生物、辐射、核、爆炸物(CBRNE)知识变化和技能信心。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 May 9;17:e387. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2023.52.
5
Hybrid warfare and counter-terrorism medicine.混合战争与反恐医学。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):589-593. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02230-y. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
Terrorism-Related Attacks in East Asia from 1970 through 2020.2020 年之前东亚地区与恐怖主义相关的袭击事件。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Apr;38(2):232-236. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23000109. Epub 2023 Jan 30.