Suppr超能文献

护士主导的脑卒中康复后照护对长期心理社会结局的经济评价:与常规护理的比较。

Economic evaluation of nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing long-term psychosocial outcome: a comparison to care-as-usual.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 25;11(2):e039201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039201.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost-effectiveness of nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing psychosocial outcome at 6 months post stroke, compared with care-as-usual.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation within a comparative effectiveness research design.

SETTING

Primary care (2016-2017) and community settings (2011-2013) in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Persons who suffered from ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, or a transient ischaemic attack and were discharged home after visiting the emergency department, hospitalisation or inpatient rehabilitation.

INTERVENTIONS

Nurse-led stroke aftercare at 6 months post stroke addressing psychosocial functioning by providing screening, psycho-education, emotional support and referral to specialist care when needed. Care-as-usual concerned routine follow-up care including secondary prevention programmes and a consultation with the neurologist at 6 weeks post stroke.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measure of cost-effectiveness was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated by the quality of life measured by the five-dimensional, three-level EuroQol. Costs were assessed using a cost-questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and social participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation) restrictions subscale.

RESULTS

Health outcomes were significantly better in stroke aftercare for QALYs (Δ=0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09) and social participation (Δ=4.91; 95% CI 1.89 to 7.93) compared with care-as-usual. Total societal costs were €1208 higher in stroke aftercare than in care-as-usual (95% CI -€3881 to €6057). Healthcare costs were in total €1208 higher in stroke aftercare than in care-as-usual (95% CI -€3881 to €6057). Average costs of stroke aftercare were €91 (SD=€3.20) per person. Base case cost-effectiveness analyses showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €24 679 per QALY gained. Probability of stroke aftercare being cost-effective was 64% on a €50 000 willingness-to-pay level.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing psychosocial functioning showed to be a low-cost intervention and is likely to be a cost-effective addition to care-as-usual. It plays an important role by screening and addressing psychosocial problem, not covered by usual care.

摘要

目的

在比较常规护理的基础上,研究护士主导的脑卒中康复护理对脑卒中后 6 个月心理社会结局的成本效益。

设计

基于比较有效性研究设计的经济评估。

地点

荷兰的初级保健(2016-2017 年)和社区环境(2011-2013 年)。

参与者

曾因缺血性或出血性脑卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作而就诊于急诊、住院或住院康复治疗,出院回家的患者。

干预措施

脑卒中后 6 个月时,护士主导的脑卒中康复护理通过提供筛查、心理教育、情感支持以及在需要时转介给专科护理来改善心理社会功能。常规护理包括二级预防计划和脑卒中后 6 周时与神经科医生的咨询。

主要和次要结局指标

主要的成本效益衡量标准是健康调整生命年(QALYs),通过五个维度三个层次的欧洲生命质量量表(EQ-5D)测量的生活质量进行评估。使用成本问卷评估成本。次要结局是情绪(医院焦虑抑郁量表)和社会参与(康复参与评估量表)受限亚量表。

结果

与常规护理相比,脑卒中康复护理在 QALYs(Δ=0.05;95%CI 0.01 至 0.09)和社会参与(Δ=4.91;95%CI 1.89 至 7.93)方面的健康结果显著更好。与常规护理相比,脑卒中康复护理的总社会成本高出 1208 欧元(95%CI-3881 至 6057 欧元)。脑卒中康复护理的医疗保健成本总高出 1208 欧元(95%CI-3881 至 6057 欧元)。脑卒中康复护理的人均平均成本为 91 欧元(SD=3.20 欧元)。基于成本效益分析,每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比为 24679 欧元。在 50000 欧元的意愿支付水平上,脑卒中康复护理具有成本效益的概率为 64%。

结论

针对心理社会功能的护士主导的脑卒中康复护理是一种低成本干预措施,并且很可能是常规护理的有效补充。它通过筛查和解决常规护理未涵盖的心理社会问题发挥着重要作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验