• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国私人场所中≥18 岁男性在开始暴露前预防之前和之后的性传播感染检测和流行率。

Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Prevalence Before and After Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Men Aged ≥18 Years in US Private Settings.

机构信息

From the The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jul 1;48(7):515-520. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001339.

DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001339
PMID:33633074
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends initial and follow-up sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV testing when taking HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We assessed frequencies of STIs and HIV testing and rates of STIs before and after PrEP initiation among men aged ≥18 years.

METHODS

We used the OptumLabs database for this cohort study. We measured STI/HIV testing rates and prevalence in 2 time intervals: (1) within 90 days before and on the date of PrEP initiation and (2) within 45 days of the 180th day after the date of PrEP initiation.

RESULTS

Of 4210 men who initiated PrEP in 2016 to 2017 and continuously used PrEP for ≥180 days, 45.7%, 45.7%, and 56.0% were tested for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and HIV, respectively, at the second time interval. These percentages were significantly lower than those at the first time interval (58.3%, 57.9%, and 73.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). Chlamydia and gonorrhea prevalence rates at the second time interval were 6.5% and 6.2%, respectively, versus 5.0% and 4.7%, respectively, at the first time interval. Most gonorrhea or chlamydia infections at the second time intervals seem to be new infections new infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexually transmitted infection/HIV testing for PrEP users in the real-world private settings is much lower than in clinical trials. High STI prevalence before and after PrEP initiation in this study suggests that patients taking PrEP have an increased risk of acquiring STI. Interventions to improve provider adherence for PrEP users are urgently needed.

摘要

背景

美国疾病控制与预防中心建议在开始接受 HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)时,对性传播感染(STI)和 HIV 进行初始和随访检测。我们评估了≥18 岁男性在开始 PrEP 前后 STI 和 HIV 检测的频率以及 STI 发生率。

方法

我们使用 OptumLabs 数据库进行了这项队列研究。我们在两个时间间隔内测量了 STI/HIV 检测率和流行率:(1)在开始 PrEP 前 90 天内和开始 PrEP 当天;(2)在开始 PrEP 后第 180 天的 45 天内。

结果

在 2016 年至 2017 年期间开始使用 PrEP 且连续使用≥180 天的 4210 名男性中,分别有 45.7%、45.7%和 56.0%在第二个时间间隔内接受了衣原体、淋病和 HIV 的检测。这些百分比明显低于第一个时间间隔(分别为 58.3%、57.9%和 73.5%;P < 0.01)。第二个时间间隔的衣原体和淋病患病率分别为 6.5%和 6.2%,而第一个时间间隔分别为 5.0%和 4.7%。第二个时间间隔的大多数淋病或衣原体感染似乎是新感染。

结论

在实际私人环境中,接受 PrEP 的人群进行性传播感染/HIV 检测的频率远低于临床试验。本研究中,PrEP 开始前后 STI 的高流行率表明,服用 PrEP 的患者感染 STI 的风险增加。迫切需要采取干预措施来提高提供者对 PrEP 使用者的依从性。

相似文献

1
Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Prevalence Before and After Preexposure Prophylaxis Initiation Among Men Aged ≥18 Years in US Private Settings.美国私人场所中≥18 岁男性在开始暴露前预防之前和之后的性传播感染检测和流行率。
Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jul 1;48(7):515-520. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001339.
2
Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing, Prevalence, and Treatment Among Individuals Receiving HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Within an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.在综合性医疗保健服务系统中,接受 HIV 暴露前预防人群的性传播感染检测、流行率和治疗情况。
Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Sep 1;49(9):616-621. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001665. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
3
Impact of the Early COVID-19 Pandemic on the Number of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Uses and the Proportion of Preexposure Prophylaxis Users Receiving Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Services.COVID-19 大流行早期对 HIV 暴露前预防用药数量及接受性传播感染检测服务的暴露前预防用药使用者比例的影响。
Sex Transm Dis. 2023 May 1;50(5):304-309. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001726. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
4
Incidence and Correlates of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men Participating in the HIV Prevention Trials Network 073 Preexposure Prophylaxis Study.参与艾滋病预防试验网络073暴露前预防研究的男男性行为黑人中性传播感染的发病率及相关因素
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 15;69(9):1597-1604. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1141.
5
Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis With Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Individuals at High Risk of HIV Infection.HIV 暴露前预防与 HIV 感染高危个体性传播感染发病率的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1380-1390. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2947.
6
Assessment for sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men attending a nurse-run HIV preexposure prophylaxis clinic.男男性行为者在护士主导的 HIV 暴露前预防诊所就诊时的性传播感染评估。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021 Feb 18;33(12):1290-1294. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000569.
7
Incident Cases of Sexually Transmitted Infections among Users of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Honolulu, Hawai'i.檀香山预防性暴露前预防 HIV 感染使用者的性传播感染事件案例。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2021 Jul;80(7):148-154.
8
Global Epidemiologic Characteristics of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Individuals Using Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球使用暴露前预防(PrEP)预防 HIV 感染的个体中性传播感染的流行病学特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917134. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17134.
9
Discussion and Initiation of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Were Rare Following Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Veterans.讨论并启动艾滋病毒暴露前预防措施在退伍军人性病诊断后很少进行。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2482-2488. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07034-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men Prescribed Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Baltimore City, Maryland.马里兰州巴尔的摩市接受暴露前预防治疗的男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系者的性传播感染筛查。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 17;71(10):2637-2644. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1145.

引用本文的文献

1
STI Testing among Medicaid Enrollees Initiating PrEP for HIV Prevention in Six Southern States.六南方州中接受 Medicaid 保险的艾滋病毒预防药物 PrEP 使用者的性传播感染检测。
South Med J. 2023 Jun;116(6):455-463. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001564.