BACKGROUND

Evidence-based clinical guidelines consider physical exercise one of the best nonpharmacological interventions for low-back pain (LBP), but it is necessary to clarify the exercise-induced hypoalgesia effect of different modalities of exercise in chronic pain populations.

PURPOSE

This study focused on exploring acute changes in tactile and pressure-pain perception and lumbar strength and flexibility in patients with nonspecific chronic LBP (NSCLBP) after performing one of three 20-minute physical exercise modalities.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients with NSCLBP were pseudorandomly distributed into three groups of 20-minute physical exercise - 1) aerobic (n=21, mean age 42±9.72 years, nine men), 2) stretching (n=21, mean age 40±11.37 years, ten men), and 3) strengthening (n=20, mean age 35.80±11.56 years, ten men) - and 4) a control group (n=19, mean age 38.64±10.24 years, eight men), and completed self-reported questionnaires during the same period. Tactile and pressure-pain thresholds and isometric lumbar muscle endurance and flexibility were assessed before and after this brief exercise-based intervention.

RESULTS

All groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and clinical data, cardiovascular capacity, and self-reported data onphysical disability, mood, motivation, psychological response to stimulus properties of physical exercise, and physical activity enjoyment. Our analyses revealed higher tactile sensitivity (<0.001) and pressure-pain thresholds (<0.001) at the forefinger than other body locations. We also found lower pain sensitivity (=0.010) and pressure pain-intensity ratings (=0.001) and higher lumbar flexibility (<0.001) after intervention. After calculation of absolute pre-post differences, higher tactile sensitivity was observed at the gluteus medius muscle than the erector spinal muscle only after aerobic intervention (=0.046).

CONCLUSION

These results add some evidence about different modalities of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in NSCLBP. However, the fact that we also found improvements in the control group limits our conclusions.