• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在部分肾切除术中仅夹闭肾动脉或同时夹闭肾动静脉对短期和长期功能结果的影响:夹闭技术重要吗?

The effect of renal artery-only or renal artery-vein clamping during partial nephrectomy on short and long-term functional results: Is clamping technique important?

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara University, Altındag, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jul;53(7):1317-1323. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02812-y. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-021-02812-y
PMID:33634431
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of artery-only (AO) and artery-vein (AV) clamping during partial nephrectomy (PN) on short- and long-term renal function outcome.

METHODS

Medical records of 154 patients in the AO group and 192 patients in the AV group who underwent open and minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) PN between January 2011 and January 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Preoperative patient and tumor-specific characteristics in addition to perioperative factors and renal function outcomes were compared. The change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from postoperative 1-3 days, 12 and 24 months after surgery was calculated. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined a as a > 25% reduction in eGFR.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the clamping techniques in terms of postoperative 1-3 days, 12 and 24 months eGFR change percentage and risk of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD). No significant difference in short- and long-term renal functions was found between the minimally invasive or open AO and AV clamping subgroups at any time point. In multivariate analysis, the R.E.N.A.L score (AO group p = 0.026, AV group p < 0.001) and preoperative eGFR (AO group p < 0.001, AV group p = 0.010) were strong predictors of the acute kidney injury in both groups. Older age (AO group p = 0.045, AV group p = 0.010) and preoperative eGFR (AO group p = 0.008, AV group p = 0.002) were significantly associated with CKD progression at 2-year follow-up in both groups.

CONCLUSION

AV clamping does not adversely affect postoperative renal function compared to AO clamping. Preoperative patient- and tumor-related factors are more important for renal function regardless of the clamping technique.

摘要

目的

评估在部分肾切除术(PN)中仅夹闭动脉(AO)和动静脉(AV)对短期和长期肾功能结果的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间接受开放和微创(腹腔镜/机器人)PN 的 154 例 AO 组和 192 例 AV 组患者的病历。比较了术前患者和肿瘤特征以及围手术期因素和肾功能结果。计算了术后 1-3 天、12 个月和 24 个月时估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化。急性肾损伤(AKI)定义为 eGFR 下降> 25%。

结果

在术后 1-3 天、12 个月和 24 个月时 eGFR 变化百分比和进展为慢性肾脏病(CKD)的风险方面,两种夹闭技术之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在任何时间点,微创或开放的 AO 和 AV 夹闭亚组之间的短期和长期肾功能均无显著差异。多变量分析显示,R.E.N.A.L 评分(AO 组 p=0.026,AV 组 p<0.001)和术前 eGFR(AO 组 p<0.001,AV 组 p=0.010)是两组发生 AKI 的强预测因素。年龄较大(AO 组 p=0.045,AV 组 p=0.010)和术前 eGFR(AO 组 p=0.008,AV 组 p=0.002)与两组 2 年随访时 CKD 进展显著相关。

结论

与 AO 夹闭相比,AV 夹闭不会对术后肾功能产生不利影响。无论夹闭技术如何,术前患者和肿瘤相关因素对肾功能更为重要。

相似文献

1
The effect of renal artery-only or renal artery-vein clamping during partial nephrectomy on short and long-term functional results: Is clamping technique important?在部分肾切除术中仅夹闭肾动脉或同时夹闭肾动静脉对短期和长期功能结果的影响:夹闭技术重要吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jul;53(7):1317-1323. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02812-y. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Comparison of Renal Artery Renal Artery-Vein Clamping During Partial Nephrectomy: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.肾动脉-静脉夹闭与肾部分切除术在肾部分切除术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):523-530. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0580. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Comparison of renal ischemic damage during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with artery-vein and artery-only clamping.腹腔镜部分肾切除术时夹闭动静脉与仅夹闭动脉对肾缺血损伤的比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Mar;28(3):306-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0446. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Comparison of clamping technique in robotic partial nephrectomy: does unclamped partial nephrectomy improve perioperative outcomes and renal function?机器人辅助肾部分切除术中阻断技术的比较:非阻断性肾部分切除术能否改善围手术期结局及肾功能?
Can J Urol. 2013 Feb;20(1):6662-7.
5
Comparison of clamping strategies in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1 tumors.比较 cT1 期肿瘤微创部分肾切除术的夹闭策略。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Apr;31(4):609-614. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1840397. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
6
Main Renal Artery Clamping With or Without Renal Vein Clamping During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Masses: Perioperative and Long-term Functional Outcomes.临床T1期肾肿瘤机器人辅助肾部分切除术期间主肾动脉夹闭伴或不伴肾静脉夹闭:围手术期及长期功能结局
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Robotic unclamped "minimal-margin" partial nephrectomy: ongoing refinement of the anatomic zero-ischemia concept.机器人无阻断“最小切缘”部分肾切除术:解剖零缺血概念的持续完善。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):705-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.044. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Prospective study comparing two techniques of renal clamping in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative parameters.前瞻性研究比较腹腔镜部分肾切除术两种肾夹闭技术:对围手术期参数的影响。
J Endourol. 2012 May;26(5):509-14. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0088. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
9
Renal oxygenation during partial nephrectomy: a comparison between artery-only occlusion versus artery and vein occlusion.部分肾切除术期间的肾脏氧合:仅动脉阻断与动脉和静脉阻断的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):470-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0466. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
10
Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.机器人辅助部分肾切除术超选择性夹闭与主动脉夹闭的回顾性比较。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):713-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Artery Only Versus Artery and Vein Clamping in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.部分肾切除术患者中单纯动脉夹闭与动静脉夹闭的手术及功能结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Turk J Urol. 2022 May;48(3):180-195. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22009.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Renal Artery Renal Artery-Vein Clamping During Partial Nephrectomy: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.肾动脉-静脉夹闭与肾部分切除术在肾部分切除术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2020 Apr;34(4):523-530. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0580. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Predictive Value of Nephrometry Scores in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肾部分切除术的肾肿瘤评分的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):490-504. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
3
The ischemic/nephrotoxic acute kidney injury and the use of renal biomarkers in clinical practice.
缺血性/肾毒性急性肾损伤及肾脏生物标志物在临床实践中的应用。
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Apr;39:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Main Renal Artery Clamping With or Without Renal Vein Clamping During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Masses: Perioperative and Long-term Functional Outcomes.临床T1期肾肿瘤机器人辅助肾部分切除术期间主肾动脉夹闭伴或不伴肾静脉夹闭:围手术期及长期功能结局
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Renal Ischemia and Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Collaborative Review of the Literature.肾部分切除术后的肾缺血与肾功能变化:文献综述协作。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Decline in renal function after partial nephrectomy: etiology and prevention.部分肾切除术后肾功能下降:病因与预防。
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):1889-98. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.093. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Comparison of renal ischemic damage during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with artery-vein and artery-only clamping.腹腔镜部分肾切除术时夹闭动静脉与仅夹闭动脉对肾缺血损伤的比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Mar;28(3):306-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0446. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
Surgically induced chronic kidney disease may be associated with a lower risk of progression and mortality than medical chronic kidney disease.手术引起的慢性肾脏病的进展和死亡风险可能低于医学引起的慢性肾脏病。
J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1649-55. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.121. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
Renal oxygenation during partial nephrectomy: a comparison between artery-only occlusion versus artery and vein occlusion.部分肾切除术期间的肾脏氧合:仅动脉阻断与动脉和静脉阻断的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):470-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0466. Epub 2012 Dec 26.