Suppr超能文献

根据心力衰竭类型,房颤合并心力衰竭患者的卒中和全身性栓塞情况

Stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure according to heart failure type.

作者信息

Uhm Jae-Sun, Kim Jun, Yu Hee Tae, Kim Tae-Hoon, Lee So-Ryoung, Cha Myung-Jin, Choi Eue-Keun, Lee Jung Myung, Kim Jin-Bae, Park Junbeom, Park Jin-Kyu, Kang Ki-Woon, Shim Jaemin, Park Hyung Wook, Lee Young Soo, Kim Chang-Soo, Mun Ji Eun, Son Nak-Hoon, Joung Boyoung

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1582-1589. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13264. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to elucidate the risk for stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure (HF) according to HF type.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 10 780 patients with atrial fibrillation were enrolled in a multicentre prospective registry and divided according to HF type: no-HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Each group included 237 age-matched and sex-matched patients (age, 69.0 ± 10.3 years; men, 69.6%). The baseline characteristics, cumulative incidence, and hazard ratios for stroke/SE and major bleeding were compared across the groups. Patients with HF accounted for 10.3% of the total population; HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF represented 43.7%, 23.6%, and 32.7% of the patients with HF, respectively. The CHA DS -VASc score was significantly higher in the HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups than in the no-HF group. The annual stroke/SE incidence rates were 2.8%, 0.7%, 1.1%, and 0.9% in the HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF, and no-HF groups, respectively. The cumulative incidence of stroke/SE was significantly highest in the HFpEF group at 22.8 ± 10.0 months (P = 0.020). The stroke/SE risk was higher in the HFpEF group than in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups (hazard ratio, 3.192; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-9.810; P = 0.043). E/e' value was an independent risk factor for stroke/SE. There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The stroke/SE risk was the highest in the HFpEF group and comparable between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据心力衰竭(HF)类型阐明心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者发生中风和全身性栓塞(SE)的风险。

方法与结果

共有10780例心房颤动患者纳入一项多中心前瞻性登记研究,并根据HF类型进行分组:无心衰、射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)、射血分数中等的心衰(HFmrEF)和射血分数降低的心衰(HFrEF)。每组包括237例年龄和性别匹配的患者(年龄69.0±10.3岁;男性占69.6%)。比较各组的基线特征、中风/SE和大出血的累积发生率及风险比。心衰患者占总人口的10.3%;HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF分别占心衰患者的43.7%、23.6%和32.7%。HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF组的CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分显著高于无心衰组。HFpEF、HFmrEF、HFrEF和无心衰组的年中风/SE发生率分别为2.8%、0.7%、1.1%和0.9%。HFpEF组中风/SE的累积发生率最高,为22.8±10.0个月(P=0.020)。HFpEF组的中风/SE风险高于HFmrEF和HFrEF组(风险比3.192;95%置信区间1.039-9.810;P=0.043)。E/e'值是中风/SE的独立危险因素。各组大出血发生率无显著差异。

结论

HFpEF组中风/SE风险最高,HFmrEF组和HFrEF组相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a48b/8006674/8217ed7fa8d4/EHF2-8-1582-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验