Kim Hyeongsoo, Kim Tae Hoon, Cha Myung Jin, Lee Jung Myung, Park Junbeom, Park Jin Kyu, Kang Ki Woon, Shim Jaemin, Uhm Jae Sun, Kim Jun, Park Hyung Wook, Choi Eue Keun, Kim Jin Bae, Kim Changsoo, Lee Young Soo, Joung Boyoung
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2017 Nov;47(6):877-887. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0146. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
The aging population is rapidly increasing, and atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming a significant public health burden in Asia, including Korea. This study evaluated current treatment patterns and guideline adherence of AF treatment.
In a prospective observational registry (COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of Atrial Fibrillation [CODE-AF] registry), 6,275 patients with nonvalvular AF were consecutively enrolled between June 2016 and April 2017 from 10 tertiary hospitals in Korea.
The AF type was paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent in 65.3%, 30.0%, and 2.9% of patients, respectively. Underlying structural heart disease was present in 11.9%. Mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc was 2.7±1.7. Oral anticoagulation (OAC), rate control, and rhythm control were used in 70.1%, 53.9%, and 54.4% of patients, respectively. OAC was performed in 82.7% of patients with a high stroke risk. However, antithrombotic therapy was inadequately used in 53.4% of patients with a low stroke risk. For rate control in 192 patients with low ejection fraction (<40%), β-blocker (65.6%), digoxin (5.2%), or both (19.3%) were adequately used in 90.1% of patients; however, a calcium channel blocker was inadequately used in 9.9%. A rhythm control strategy was chosen in 54.4% of patients. The prescribing rate of class Ic antiarrythmics, dronedarone, and sotalol was 16.9% of patients with low ejection fraction.
This study shows how successfully guidelines can be applied in the real world. The nonadherence rate was 17.2%, 9.9%, and 22.4% for stroke prevention, rate control, and rhythm control, respectively.
老龄化人口正在迅速增加,心房颤动(AF)正成为包括韩国在内的亚洲一项重大的公共卫生负担。本研究评估了AF治疗的当前治疗模式及指南遵循情况。
在一项前瞻性观察登记研究(心房颤动症状控制和并发症预防药物比较研究[CODE-AF]登记研究)中,2016年6月至2017年4月期间,从韩国10家三级医院连续纳入了6275例非瓣膜性AF患者。
AF类型分别为阵发性、持续性和永久性的患者比例为65.3%、30.0%和2.9%。11.9%的患者存在潜在结构性心脏病。平均CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分为2.7±1.7。分别有70.1%、53.9%和54.4%的患者使用了口服抗凝药(OAC)、心率控制和节律控制。82.7%的高卒中风险患者接受了OAC治疗。然而,53.4%的低卒中风险患者抗栓治疗使用不足。对于192例射血分数低(<40%)的患者进行心率控制,90.1%的患者充分使用了β受体阻滞剂(65.6%)、地高辛(5.2%)或两者联用(19.3%);然而,钙通道阻滞剂的使用不足率为9.9%。54.4%的患者选择了节律控制策略。Ic类抗心律失常药、决奈达隆和索他洛尔的处方率在射血分数低的患者中为16.9%。
本研究展示了指南在现实世界中的应用成效。卒中预防、心率控制和节律控制的不遵循率分别为17.2%、9.9%和22.4%。