• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌的阳性预测值较低,与目标人群常见定义无关。

Low positive predictive value of computed tomography screening for lung cancer irrespective of commonly employed definitions of target population.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;149(1):58-65. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33522. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.33522
PMID:33634860
Abstract

Screening for lung cancer (LC) by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been demonstrated to reduce LC mortality in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and its implementation is in preparation in many countries. However, definition of the target population, which was based on various combinations of age ranges and definitions of heavy smoking in the RCTs, is subject to ongoing debate. Using epidemiological data from Germany, we aimed to estimate prevalence of preclinical LC and positive predictive value (PPV) of LDCT in potential target populations defined by age and smoking history. Populations aged 50 to 69, 55 to 69, 50 to 74 and 55 to 79 years were considered in this analysis. Sex-specific prevalence of preclinical LC was estimated using LC incidence data within those age ranges and annual transition rates from preclinical to clinical LC obtained by meta-analysis. Prevalence of preclinical LC among heavy smokers (defined by various pack-year thresholds) within those age ranges was estimated by combining LC prevalence in the general population with proportions of heavy smokers and relative risks for LC among them derived from epidemiological studies. PPVs were calculated by combining these prevalences with sensitivity and specificity estimates of LDCT. Estimated prevalence of LC was 0.3% to 0.5% (men) and 0.2% to 0.3% (women) in the general population and 0.8% to 1.7% in target populations of heavy smokers. Estimates of PPV of LDCT were <20% for all definitions of target populations of heavy smokers. Refined preselection of target populations would be highly desirable to increase PPV and efficiency of LDCT screening and to reduce numbers of false-positive LDCT findings.

摘要

通过低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)对肺癌(LC)进行筛查已在随机临床试验(RCT)中证明可降低 LC 的死亡率,并且许多国家都在准备实施这种筛查。然而,基于 RCT 中年龄范围和重度吸烟定义的各种组合来定义目标人群,这一做法仍存在争议。本研究利用德国的流行病学数据,旨在根据年龄和吸烟史,估计潜在目标人群中临床前 LC 的患病率和 LDCT 的阳性预测值(PPV)。本分析考虑了年龄在 50 至 69 岁、55 至 69 岁、50 至 74 岁和 55 至 79 岁的人群。使用这些年龄范围内的 LC 发病率数据以及通过荟萃分析获得的从临床前到临床 LC 的年度转移率来估计女性和男性临床前 LC 的患病率。通过将一般人群中的 LC 患病率与流行病学研究中得出的重度吸烟者的比例以及他们的 LC 相对风险相结合,来估计这些年龄范围内重度吸烟者(通过各种吸烟包年阈值定义)的临床前 LC 患病率。通过将这些患病率与 LDCT 的敏感性和特异性估计相结合来计算 PPV。估计的 LC 患病率在一般人群中为 0.3%至 0.5%(男性)和 0.2%至 0.3%(女性),在重度吸烟者的目标人群中为 0.8%至 1.7%。对于所有重度吸烟者的目标人群定义,LDCT 的估计 PPV 均<20%。高度期望对目标人群进行精细的预筛选,以提高 LDCT 筛查的 PPV 和效率,并减少 LDCT 假阳性结果的数量。

相似文献

1
Low positive predictive value of computed tomography screening for lung cancer irrespective of commonly employed definitions of target population.计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌的阳性预测值较低,与目标人群常见定义无关。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;149(1):58-65. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33522. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
2
Low-dose CT screening among never-smokers with or without a family history of lung cancer in Taiwan: a prospective cohort study.台湾不吸烟人群和有肺癌家族史人群的低剂量 CT 筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Feb;12(2):141-152. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00338-7. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Role of Low-Dose Computerized Tomography in Lung Cancer Screening among Never-Smokers.低剂量计算机断层扫描在不吸烟人群肺癌筛查中的作用。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Mar;14(3):436-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Mortality, survival and incidence rates in the ITALUNG randomised lung cancer screening trial.ITALUNG 随机肺癌筛查试验中的死亡率、生存率和发病率。
Thorax. 2017 Sep;72(9):825-831. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209825. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
6
Long-Term Follow-up Results of the DANTE Trial, a Randomized Study of Lung Cancer Screening with Spiral Computed Tomography.DANTE 试验的长期随访结果,一项使用螺旋 CT 进行肺癌筛查的随机研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15;191(10):1166-75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1475OC.
7
Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.低剂量计算机断层扫描在高危人群中的肺癌筛查:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(69):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta22690.
8
9
Comparison of discrimination performance of 11 lung cancer risk models for predicting lung cancer in a prospective cohort of screening-age adults from Germany followed over 17 years.比较 11 种肺癌风险模型在德国筛查年龄段成年人前瞻性队列中预测肺癌的区分性能,随访时间超过 17 年。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Dec;174:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
10
Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening-Results from the randomized German LUSI trial.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查降低肺癌死亡率-来自德国 LUSI 随机试验的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;146(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32486. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic significance of the novel biomarker combination for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer detection: results of the blind clinical study.新型生物标志物组合对早期非小细胞肺癌检测的诊断意义:盲法临床研究结果
Front Oncol. 2025 May 19;15:1508563. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1508563. eCollection 2025.
2
Early cancer screening surveillance in one medical center of China.中国某一医学中心的早期癌症筛查监测。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 27;12:e18179. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18179. eCollection 2024.