oude Egbrink M G, Tangelder G J, Slaaf D W, Reneman R S
Department of Physiology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thromb Haemost. 1988 Feb 25;59(1):23-8.
The walls of rabbit mesenteric arterioles and venules (diameter 20 to 40 microns) were punctured with glass micropipets (tip diameter 6 to 8 microns). Thromboembolic reactions resulting from this standardized, small mechanical vessel wall injury could be quantified in vivo with the use of intravital video-microscopy. Following induction of the injury thrombus growth started immediately (less than 0.1 s). Bleeding times were short, on the average less than 2 s, and did not differ between arterioles and venules. The duration of the embolization process was significantly longer in arterioles than in venules (median 101 and 17 s, respectively), and more emboli were produced in arterioles than in venules (median 6 and 1, respectively). Arteriolar thrombi were more effective in plugging the punctured holes than venular thrombi. The differences in thromboembolic reaction between arterioles and venules, as found in the present study, can probably not be explained by fluid dynamic factors.
用玻璃微吸管(尖端直径6至8微米)穿刺兔肠系膜小动脉和小静脉(直径20至40微米)的血管壁。这种标准化的、微小的机械性血管壁损伤所引发的血栓栓塞反应,可通过活体视频显微镜在体内进行量化。损伤诱导后,血栓形成立即开始(小于0.1秒)。出血时间较短,平均小于2秒,小动脉和小静脉之间无差异。栓塞过程的持续时间在小动脉中明显长于小静脉(中位数分别为101秒和17秒),小动脉中产生的栓子比小静脉中更多(中位数分别为6个和1个)。动脉血栓比静脉血栓更有效地堵塞穿刺孔。本研究中发现的小动脉和小静脉之间血栓栓塞反应的差异,可能无法用流体动力学因素来解释。