Suppr超能文献

Impella 在真实世界心原性休克患者中的应用:令人警醒的结果。

Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Hospital Maria Hilf Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247667. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock could benefit from ventricular assist device support using the Impella microaxial blood pump. However, recent studies suggested Impella not to improve outcomes. We, therefore, evaluated outcomes and predictors in a real-world scenario.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center trial, 125 patients suffering from cardiac arrest/cardiogenic shock between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed. 93 Patients had a prior successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Associations of covariates with the primary endpoint were assessed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and optimal cut-offs (using Youden index) were obtained.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was high (81%). Baseline lactate was 4.7mmol/L [IQR = 7.1mmol/L]. In multivariable logistic regression, only age (aOR 1.13 95%CI 1.06-1.20; p<0.001) and lactate (aOR 1.23 95%CI 1.004-1.516; p = 0.046) were associated with hospital mortality, and the respective optimal cut-offs were >3.3mmol/L and age >66 years. Patients were retrospectively stratified into three risk groups: Patients aged ≤66 years and lactate ≤3.3mmol (low-risk; n = 22); patients aged >66 years or lactate >3.3mmol/L (medium-risk; n = 52); and patients both aged >66 years and lactate >3.3mmol/L (high-risk, n = 51). Risk of death increased from 41% in the low-risk group, to 79% in the medium risk group and 100% in the high-risk group. The predictive abilities of this model were high (AUC 0.84; 95% 0.77-0.92).

CONCLUSION

Mortality was high in this real-world collective of severely ill cardiogenic shock patients. Better patient selection is warranted to avoid unethical use of Impella. Age and lactate might help to improve patient selection.

摘要

背景

患有心源性休克的危重症患者可以从 Impella 微轴流血泵支持中获益。然而,最近的研究表明 Impella 并不能改善预后。因此,我们在真实环境中评估了结果和预测因素。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心试验中,分析了 2008 年至 2018 年间患有心脏骤停/心源性休克的 125 名患者。93 名患者之前有过成功的心肺复苏。主要终点是住院死亡率。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归评估协变量与主要终点的关联。获得调整后的优势比(aOR)和最佳截断值(使用约登指数)。

结果

住院死亡率很高(81%)。基线乳酸值为 4.7mmol/L[IQR=7.1mmol/L]。多变量逻辑回归显示,只有年龄(aOR 1.13 95%CI 1.06-1.20;p<0.001)和乳酸(aOR 1.23 95%CI 1.004-1.516;p=0.046)与住院死亡率相关,相应的最佳截断值为>3.3mmol/L 和年龄>66 岁。患者被回顾性分为三个风险组:年龄≤66 岁且乳酸≤3.3mmol(低危;n=22);年龄>66 岁或乳酸>3.3mmol/L(中危;n=52);年龄>66 岁且乳酸>3.3mmol/L(高危,n=51)。低危组的死亡率为 41%,中危组为 79%,高危组为 100%,死亡率逐渐增加。该模型的预测能力较高(AUC 0.84;95%置信区间 0.77-0.92)。

结论

在这个真实世界的严重心源性休克患者群体中,死亡率很高。需要更好的患者选择,以避免不道德地使用 Impella。年龄和乳酸可能有助于改善患者选择。

相似文献

1
Impella use in real-world cardiogenic shock patients: Sobering outcomes.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247667. eCollection 2021.
2
Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry.
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jan;6(1):23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967224. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
The Impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;97(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.053. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
5
Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Feb;7(1):53-61. doi: 10.1177/2048872617743194. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
8
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.
9
The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01251-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Therapeutic Use of Impella Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 7;14(10):e30045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30045. eCollection 2022 Oct.

本文引用的文献

2
Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics in critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5475-3. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Overview of Impella and mechanical devices in cardiogenic shock.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Apr;15(4):293-299. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1456334. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Utilization of the Impella for hemodynamic support during percutaneous intervention and cardiogenic shock: an insight.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Oct;14(10):789-804. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1374849. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Lactate and lactate clearance as valuable tool to evaluate ECMO therapy in cardiogenic shock.
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24;69(3):278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Retrospective analysis of circulatory support with the Impella CP® device in patients with therapy refractory cardiogenic shock.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验